Whether big or small. We all have that one thing from Scifi we wished were real. I’d love to see a cool underground city with like a SkyDome or a space hotel for instance.

    • astanix@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      6 days ago

      As long as shareholder value is the number one thing it just cant happen.

      • rudyharrelson@lemmy.radio
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        35
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        OP says, “with our current current level of technology.”

        We have the technology to overcome any logistics issue pertaining to eliminating scarcity (and by extension, poverty). What we lack is the societal structure.

        • whoisearth@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 days ago

          This is what frustrates me because in theory yes, you’re right. But in reality those shareholders are not who you think they are. Many of them are your relatives through 401k and RRSP managed funds.

          What I’m getting at is it would be great to Luigi a bunch of billionaires but the reality is the problem is systemic and no amount of murder is going to solve that.

          We go back to the Levellers and the Diggers. My gut tells me we are going to everyone screaming for change ultimately get what they want which is someone will be beheaded but then in the aftermath you all have no fucking plan and guess what? In a few years we are going to be right back here again.

          I hope I’m wrong, but history has a way of repeating the same beats over and over again.

  • buzz86us@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    Hemp as a replacement for plastics and synthetic materials. Food packaging shouldn’t have a longer shelf life than it’s contents.

    Sunchips was using PLA, which is a step in the right direction.

    • Lemminary@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      6 days ago

      I’m on board with ethical and opt-in telemetry. Knowing how your users interact with your app is very useful, but not many companies can show restraint when money is involved.

      • Aeri@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        6 days ago

        If my data was used to refine and improve the products and services I interact with I’d be fine with it but as it stands it’s just used to help make my life hell and exploit my existence for cash.

      • weirdbeardgame@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        6 days ago

        100% this. Telemetry and market research are fine. Hell Some opt in, totally 100% disableable targeted ads are fine as long as they’re not excessive and in the way. Flagrant selling of info however, does not spark joy.

  • rowinxavier@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    5 days ago

    Post capitalism.

    We have automation for so much manufacturing. We have solar energy which is basically free after manufacture. We could spend a fairly small amount of time really working towards automating most resource extraction and processing.

    We could have a really good standard of living not just in the west but globally and we could in the process resolve the threats of climate change but instead we have billionaires.

    • PodPerson@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      I think if we had the tech to make replicators (Trek), we would easily be able to go full on post-cap, as that would essentially end hunger, our over extraction of earth’s resources, landfills, recycling, people not being able to afford basics like groceries, etc. I think we have the capability to do that now without that tech, but as a species, lack the will and compassion.

      • rowinxavier@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 days ago

        From what I have read there is no physical reason that we could not all have a reasonable standard of living right now with no extra technology. The reason for poverty is not a scarcity if resources, it is a distribution problem. Some people take too much and use systems like law and governance to enforce their relative position. Ditching individual wealth would solve most of the issues which prevent a good life for everyone. Being as most wars are ultimately about wealth and the same for borders it would be revolutionary.

  • psion1369@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    I think a moon colony was possible at minimum the mid 90’s. I only think bureaucracy got in the way along with a very stunted space shuttle.

    • HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 days ago

      There is also the cost.

      The American program to go to the Moon cost several percentage points of American GDP over several years to get there. The USA could have physically had a moon base up there, but it would have been wildly expensive.

      • psion1369@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 days ago

        I will agree there. But the mining and manufacturing potential is rather insane. We could make money back rather quickly.

    • CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 days ago

      Agreed, a lot of sci-fi infastructure is technically feasable its just the logistics and our lack of organisation as a species that gets in the way. We could also technically start on a dyson swarm and a lunar space elevator (not an earth one though) with modern technology and materials.

      • psion1369@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        I’m glad to see that we are moving forward with it, I just would rather it not be by Elon. But he has the tools to get it done.

  • twice_hatch@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    7 days ago

    Arcologies.

    Dense housing with good soundproofing, atop commercial space, in a walkable neighborhood.

    Wouldn’t need rent control if there was more houses.

    • PlexSheep@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 days ago

      Plants on buildings bring some architectural and safety challenges, depending on how large they are. You need to somehow get dirt and water up, and the dirt can be pretty heavy. If something falls down into the ground it could hit someone and injured them. And also, with time, roots could lessen the structural integrity of a building.

    • Lemminary@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 days ago

      I can see replacing cash with transfers but not removing currency entirely, but that’s my POV. What would you replace it with instead?

      • Venus_Ziegenfalle@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        6 days ago

        What would you replace it with instead?

        Nothing. Humanity as a whole would have to evolve past the carrot and stick mentality for this to work. That’s why I said it probably won’t happen 😅

  • brygphilomena@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    Augmented reality overlaying historical photos and 3d models so you can literally see history as your walking.

    Imagine being able to visit The White City that was built for the World’s Fair in Chicago. Or seeing New York before sky scrapers dominated the landscape.

  • arararagi@ani.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    I never stopped dreaming about flying cars, I just think it’s not gonna happen because a crash would easily kill people just sitting in their homes.

    • LH0ezVT@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      Helicopters exist, they are expensive, loud, require pilot training and skill, and still crash sometimes.

    • Couldbealeotard@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      6 days ago

      Compared to aviation, road vehicles have virtually no structured regulations.

      Even road rules are considered optional by many drivers. Lots of people drive without a licence.

  • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    6 days ago

    Here is something we don’t have that I think we could: Automated vegetable farming.

    I’ve seen these watering gantries that are fixed at the center of a circular field and then rotate radially around that point to water the field. Could you use that as a rail with an effector arm on it that can plant, weed, tend, fertilize and harvest the field, such that in goes seeds and out comes vegetables? Without the liability of free roaming robotic tractors and combine harvesters. Surely the issue here would be software.

    • Yaky@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      6 days ago

      Those are called pivots, and what you are saying seems plausible: there are vision algorithms to recognize and selectively spray weeds (see Bilberry ), recent prototypes with light-pressure grabbers to gather fruits and soft vegetables.

      Even for harvesters, there are projects to automate harvesting and swapping the grain trucks (see Outrun ). GPS-guided (or assisted) tractors are already a thing.

      Agriculture has some interesting innovations, but it often gets bogged down in corporate acquisitions and monetization.

      • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 days ago

        I’ve seen a project for adapting Reprap 3D printer technology to a raised bed garden, with a multi-function tool head that can individually plant seeds, it weeds by poking weeds deep into the soil, it waters individual plants according to that plant’s need…so I thought why not scale that up to multiple acres in size?

    • stiephelando@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 days ago

      I’m into hydroponics as a hobby grower and there are certain techniques for veggie growing that are set and forget. You plant and harvest only, no weeding, no watering. As far as I understand, traditional techniques are still cheaper though

      • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        I’m into vegetable gardening as a hobby, my land is essentially beach sand, the only thing that grows in the local dirt is tetanus, so I grow in raised beds and import or make all of my soil. What kind of hardware and rigging does a hydroponic garden take?