Mayor-President of Spain’s North African enclave of Melilla Juan Jose Imbroda has called on Morocco to establish a 500-meter-wide neutral zone along the borders of both Melilla and the nearby Spanish North African enclave of Ceuta following a severe migrant surge targeting Ceuta

      • Rioting Pacifist@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        I didn’t realize there was an expiration date on colonialism, I guess Cuba should abandon it’s claim on Guantanamo Bay too?

          • Rioting Pacifist@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            19 hours ago

            Istanbul for the Istanbulites to decide there are plenty of countries with smaller populations that have self-determinations.

            • ranzispa@mander.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 day ago

              Yes, do you?

              From Wikipedia

              A colony is a territory subject to a form of foreign rule

              Such definition does not apply because they’re part of Spain. Those places never have been a colony.

              https://www.outono.net/elentir/2026/07/31/historical-facts-for-the-uninformed-about-spain-and-the-cities-of-ceuta-and-melilla/

              It’s been over 500 years those territories are part of Spain. Moreover, it’s not like we’re talking about a region on the other side of the world, those territories do confine with Spain mainland on the sea.

              • Rioting Pacifist@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 day ago

                Such definition does not apply to Palestine because they’re part of Greater Israel. Those places never have been a colony.

                Such definition does not apply to Tibet because they’re part of China. Those places never have been a colony.

                Such definition does not apply to Réunion because they’re part of France. Those places never have been a colony.


                It’s been over 75 years those territories are part of Israel

                It’s been over 800 years those territories are part of China

                It’s been over 350 years those territories are part of France


                Moreover, it’s not like we’re talking about a region on the other side of the world, those territories do confine with Israel.

                Moreover, it’s not like we’re talking about a region on the other side of the world, those territories do confine with China.


                The problem with legitimizing colonialism is you legitimize all colonialism. The argument that Morocco didn’t exist as a country is literally a zionist talking point for Palestine

                • ranzispa@mander.xyz
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  I did not say any of those things; and I do not agree with any of those things. Please, refrain from assuming I mean things I did not say.

                  I am not in any way legitimizing colonialism.

                  I brought forward my opinion and backed it up with the necessary information. I’m in no ways saying Spain has not been a colonial county, indeed it was.

                  Could you please explain in detail the reasons as to why you believe Ceuta and Melilla should be considered colonies? I may change my mind.

                  • Rioting Pacifist@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 day ago

                    Because they were literally military outposts put on Africa by conquest, the fact it was 400 years ago and before the modern state of Morroco doesn’t change that.

                    I am not in any way legitimizing colonialism

                    You might not intent to, but you’re making excuses for why colonialism doesn’t count as colonialism, which is literally what every attempt to legitimize colonialist projects does.

                    The examples I picked are because litterally the same arguments are used:

                    • Morroco didn’t exists - modern nation-states will make it sound like the land was unused if it wasn’t claimed by another nation-state
                    • It was X years ago, just let it go

                    If the people living there had a right to self-determination it would be more complicated, but we’ve seen on mainland Spain that the Spanish so not legally or practically believe in the concept.


                    Why do you think a European colonial power should get to keep it’s overseas conquests but you don’t expand the same courtesy to China or Israel?