• WereCat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 hour ago

    It’s free on Linux. Still, I find it difficult to justify paying for a browser unless you want to directly support it.

  • Razen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    40 minutes ago

    They are endorsing linux, what a good company asking users to indirectly move to linux for their browser.

  • baggachipz@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    4 hours ago

    The fact that they have to charge $60 to not have all that crap in there should tell you everything about why they have that crap in there. Taking it out kills their revenue stream from their “free” fully-featured version.

  • motruck@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    6 hours ago

    That’s what you get for using a broader called brave. We all knew we’d end up here.

  • CerebralHawks@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Unless you absolutely want to contribute to the chromium monopoly, Firefox is right there and still free. If you’re concerned about the telemetry, LibreWolf is worth looking at.

  • KraeuterRoy@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Gonna call it now: that 60 quid ‘one time’ purchase is not gonna be the end of it.

    In, at most, a couple of years, one of these things will happen:

    • the model will be switched to a monthly subscription
    • features will be cut and sold separately
    • ‘limited, non-targeted’ ads ‘from trusted partners’ will be introduced
    • the thing will be buried completely because it’s not financially viable
    • Dyskolos@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      That’s what one gets for installing US-tech. They invented enshittification and here we go.

      Knew I was right to never even check brave out.

    • helpImTrappedOnline@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      9 hours ago

      Don’t forget the “major” version increment that breaks “lifetime”.

      • Oh, you’re mistaken. The license is for the lifetime of version 32. To use version 33 you must upgrade. But no rush, you have until version 33.1 before we activate the kill switch.
      • T156@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Or they rebrand it, and pull the “lifetime is only to the end of the product lifetime” trick.

    • gankouskhan@piefed.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Firefox+Betterfox is whatever brave is trying to do here, but free and open. Fuck brave and their scummy practices. Module isn’t perfect, but in comparison is clear.

  • 9tr6gyp3@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Huh, funnily enough, Ive introduced my own $60 fee if they want me to read the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy agreements that come along with their browser.

  • FilesForWallabies@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    12 hours ago

    You can go into the settings and manually disable (nearly?) all the features that are removed in the paid version without paying anything. That’s what I did. They aren’t paywalling the ability disable the features.

    It doesn’t matter to me whether someone uses Brave or not, but the headline is misleading, though pedantically accurate.

  • XLE@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Mozilla take note. You can actually get money from your users for a change, and not just through Google.

    Especially when your userbase, the people you’re supposedly building your browser for, keep telling you to keep AI out of it.

    Brave is actually listening to their users. Mozilla should feel humiliated that they never do.

    • Dyskolos@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      I get all Mozilla hate, but I’d rake them twice before touching google with a 10m-pole.

      And what else have we got? Some more or less decent forks of either Firefox or chrome. Which still needs the base to exist.

    • T156@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      7 hours ago

      Mozilla, the company that recently added a “disable AI” toggle to Firefox?

      It’s not as good as not implementing the things in the first place, for people who don’t want it, but making it a paid model for removing features would net them more flack, I feel. They’d be accused of trying to squeeze their user base, when Firefox is traditionally free.

      • WhiteOakBayou@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 hours ago

        I saw that toggle for the first time today. Made me feel a little better about all the AI stuff and that sometimes my telemetry settings reset. I don’t know if the tele thing is ff or just my config to be clear. Today my wife asked me for how to get rid of the ai search summary in Chrome. That leads me to believe that even some “normies” aren’t thrilled with AI everywhere. I agree with you that a paid version of ff would rankle the community.