Date of 4 June remains one of China’s strictest taboos, with government using increasingly sophisticated tools to censor its discussion

There is no official death toll but activists believe hundreds, possibly thousands, were killed by China’s People’s Liberation Army in the streets around Tiananmen Square, Beijing’s central plaza, on 4 June 1989.

The date of 4 June remains one of China’s strictest taboos, and the Chinese government employs extensive and increasingly sophisticated resources to censor any discussion or acknowledgment of it inside China. Internet censors scrub even the most obscure references to the date from online spaces, and activists in China are often put under increased surveillance or sent on enforced “holidays” away from Beijing.

New research from human rights workers has found that the sensitive date also sees heightened transnational repression of Chinese government critics overseas by the government and its proxies.

  • Timoruz@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    7 days ago

    Was genuinely thinking of walking in front of Trump’s military parade.

  • CatDogL0ver@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    6 days ago

    This is just my personal experience:

    ~I was talking to a few young Chinese. They were after born after the massacre happened.~

    “Why are Hong Kong people are so full of themselves and rebellious? They think they are better? (Derogatory comments…”, cheating among themselves, happily.

    I couldn’t help and interrupted, “Some young promising Hong Kong students were murdered, beaten and kidnapped under the mainland China. You can’t blame them for not being defensive.”

    Immediately they resorted to their memorised response, “Do you have any resources to back up what you said? The official death count was zero.”

    Of course there was no “official” news resources. China suppresses the news media.

    "It is the same as Tiananmen massacre. You won’t find any “official resources " but everyone knows people were killed.”

    Another one retorted, “The official number is zero. What official resources you have to backup your claim?”

    It was useless to talk anymore at that moment. I left. My encounter probably would be on their “report.”

    • KuroiKaze@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      I find it pretty rare to meet Chinese people like that. Most of the ones I meet know that stuff happened isn’t that the government covered it up but they don’t think that the government covering things up is all that unusual or newsworthy.

  • Jhex@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    6 days ago

    Maybe I’ll take Taiwan’s word on this one…

    Whatever the US says, you just know it’s posturing hypocritical bullshit

  • Deflated0ne@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    6 days ago

    Love the propaganda around this. Its very dramatic and all. But here in the west its held up as some big thing. The rest of the video never gets played.

    • lud@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      6 days ago

      You should(n’t) see the gruesome pictures. China is likely very happy that the tank man picture became famous when there were LOADS of other horrible images .

        • lud@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          6 days ago

          That video is really low res. Do you have any sources that prove that the moving object is a tank and that the people are students?

          But honestly it doesn’t really matter because running over people because they are protesting a dictatorship is fucking gruesome.

          • IndustryStandard@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            8
            ·
            edit-2
            6 days ago

            https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1989_Tiananmen_Square_protests_and_massacre

            Demonstrators attacked troops with poles, rocks, and molotov cocktails; Jeff Widener reported witnessing rioters setting fire to military vehicles and beating the soldiers inside them to death.[178] On one avenue in western Beijing, anti-government protestors torched a military convoy of more than 100 trucks and armored vehicles.[179] They also hijacked an armored personnel carrier, taking it on a joy ride. These scenes were captured on camera and broadcast by Chinese state television.[180]

            Good old peaceful demonstration strikes again. Luckily those students were not doing anything violent such as holding up a Palestine flag. Then the US media would tell us how violence against them is fully justified

            • kshade@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              6 days ago

              Nice use of selective quoting, the situation had already escalated at that point. From your source, one paragraph before yours:

              The advance of the army was again halted by another blockade at Muxidi, about 5 km west of the square. After protesters repelled an attempt by an anti-riot brigade to storm the bridge, regular troops advanced on the crowd and turned their weapons on them. Soldiers alternated between shooting into the air and firing directly at protesters. Soldiers raked apartment buildings with gunfire, and some people inside or on their balconies were shot.

              And, from the beginning of the section:

              At 9:30 p.m, this army encountered a blockade set up by protesters at Gongzhufen in Haidian District, and made an attempt to break through. Troops armed with anti-riot gear clashed with the protesters and began firing rubber bullets and tear gas, while the protesters in return threw rocks and soda bottles at them. Other troops fired warning shots into the air, which was ineffective.

              • lud@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                7
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                6 days ago

                Who could’ve guessed that people turn violent when you start shooting them 😱

              • IndustryStandard@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                6 days ago

                My argument was related to the APC. Which is factually true.

                Your quote however is very selective.

                On the evening of 2 June, an accident occurred in which a PAP jeep ran onto a sidewalk, killing three civilian pedestrians and injuring a fourth. This incident sparked fear that the army and the police were trying to advance into Tiananmen Square.[159] Student leaders issued emergency orders to set up roadblocks at major intersections to prevent the entry of troops into the centre of the city.[160]

                On the morning of 3 June, students and citizens intercepted and questioned a busload of plainclothed soldiers at Xinjiekou. Isolated pockets of soldiers were similarly surrounded and interrogated.[161][56]

                The soldiers were beaten by the crowd, as were Beijing security personnel who attempted to aid the soldiers. Some of the soldiers were kidnapped when they attempted to head for the hospital.[160] Several other buses carrying weapons, gear, and supplies were intercepted and boarded around Tiananmen.[160]

                At 1 pm, a crowd intercepted one of these buses at Liubukou, and several men raised military helmets on bayonets to show the rest of the crowd.[162] At 2:30 pm, a clash broke out between protesters and police.[163][160] The police attempted to disperse the crowd with tear gas, but demonstrators counterattacked and threw rocks, forcing them to retreat inside the Zhongnanhai compound through the west gate.

            • stephen01king@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              6 days ago

              So because the US media justifies the killing of Palestinians, China is justified in killing student protesters, is that what you want to say?

              Also, you seem to be arguing that since some demonstrators are acting violent, shooting at, running over and oppressing student protesters are also justified? That sounds like the same logic Zionists use to justify killing Palestinians because some of them might be Hamas. You seem to agree with Zionists quite a lot.

              • IndustryStandard@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                6 days ago

                Armed rioters burning cops alive are not “student protesters”.

                The US media somehow manages to switch the two around for their propaganda purposes.

                You apparently cannot tell the difference either.

                • stephen01king@lemmy.zip
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  6 days ago

                  And yet the student protesters are being run over despite your claim that only armed rioters are burning cops alive. The exact same reasoning Zionists use to justify killing Palestinians. Like I said, you think exactly like a Zionist, which is funny.

            • lud@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              6 days ago

              Has anyone claimed that the protests were entirely peaceful? Of course some turn violent when you roll in with your army and riot police gun blazing.

              And thanks for confirming that it wasn’t a tank.

              There really are no excuses for the killing of dozens if not hundreds of civilians and protestors.

              And the protests were entirely peaceful to begin with but of course China couldn’t let that continue.

              The censorship of the event also speaks a great deal about who’s fault it is.

              • IndustryStandard@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                6
                ·
                edit-2
                6 days ago

                The protesters on the square did not get shot. The Western media confirms nobody of the peaceful protesters on the square got killed.

                Violent rioters who stoned and burnt police did get killed. On day4. There weer already multiple police killed on day3. Even Western media acknowledges all of what I am saying happened.

                The censorship of the event also speaks a great deal about who’s fault it is.

                The amazing amount of misinformation being spread here says a lot more about how insane the Western brainwashing machine is.

    • Ledericas@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      in china they censor it on internet searches. thats why alot of thier netizens use proxies and anti-detect browsers.

  • HugeNerd@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    Oh is this the terrible bad country we shipped our entire industrial base to?

  • selkiesidhe@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    The US won’t “forget” unless China pays the Dipshit-in-chief some payoff money. He’ll then EO that it never happened.

  • IndustryStandard@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    36
    ·
    6 days ago

    Never forget when the CIA organised an armed color revolution which resulted into people shooting at the Chinese military. The clashes outsider of the square, not on it as the name suggests, resulted in a total of around 300 deaths.

    Tiananmen has to be the dumbest propaganda pount because it is so incredibly easy to debunk for anyone who has basic access to a search machine. The CIA literally admitted they backed the riots.

    The sheer hypocrisy of posting this while the American government is arming a live streamed genocide with over 60.000, likely more than 200.00p killed.

    • Godric@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      6 days ago

      Yeah, everything bad is the CIA’s fault! A one-party dictatorship would never violently suppress dissent, and anyone saying otherwise is a paid shill!

      • IndustryStandard@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        19
        ·
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        “Students” hahaha. Nice of you to leave out that the rioters started attacking the police first and literally burned police officiers alive. The peaceful protesters at the square were not attacked.

        There are actual events you can point to in which China represses their population. This is probably the dumbest one because extreme restraint was shown from the Chinese authorities.

        If it was America the guy blocking the tank from leaving the square would have been run over. And you would probably be screaming fafo.

        • Gammelfisch@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          6 days ago

          Another brain washed CCP admirer from Xi’s $0.50 Army. The CCP murdered over 70 million people, who disagreed, since 1920 and the number continues to rise.

        • Godric@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          6 days ago

          Yeah! They had it coming! The police acted with the utmost restraint when they brought tanks to a protest, and America totally would have done worse than bringing tanks to a protest and totally would have ran protestors over with said tanks!!!

          • IndustryStandard@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            8
            ·
            edit-2
            6 days ago

            Oh no he pulls out the image implying that the tank ran over a protester on the square!

            But he forgets that there is a video

            Of a man who blocks tanks driving away from the square… and… climbing on top of a military vehicle!!!

            What do you think would happen in America to someone who climbed on top of a tank and opened the hatch? And even still, he did not get shot but simply escorted away. Amazing.

            • Rin@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              9
              ·
              6 days ago

              He got carried away and never saw again you fucking brainlet

                • Godric@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  8
                  arrow-down
                  7
                  ·
                  6 days ago

                  he got carried away and was never seen again

                  Of course we don’t know his name, he got disappeared by a dictatorship. In a free country, we would know his name and he would be a powerful symbol of dissent against the government. Instead, he was erased as a human.

  • chloroken@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    69
    ·
    7 days ago

    My favorite thing to do is to watch liberals read the (very western biased) Wikipedia article on this event. The moment when they realize how many soldiers were killed before the crackdown is always radicalizing for those with even a modicum of intellectual curiosity.

    • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      55
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      7 days ago

      This sounds like how conservatives rationalize the Kent State massacre by claiming that the protesters were throwing feces.

      You’re not radicalized. You just switched which authoritarian you swear fealty to.

      • Corn@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        7 days ago

        It would be different if the protesters had lynched a dozen soldiers before they responded.

        Of course given the context of the Vietnam war, the soldiers wouldn’t have been justified even if the protesters killed some of them first; you don’t get to claim self-defense when you yourself are only there to put down a protest against imperialism.

        • Railcar8095@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          26
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          7 days ago

          I guess the Chinese soldiers were minding their own business at home with their families, and not there to just put down protests against authoritarianism.

          • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            6 days ago

            Wasn’t the problem that their families were part of the protesters? That’s why reinforcements from outside the city (without family ties) were called in.

          • Corn@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            16
            ·
            edit-2
            7 days ago

            See the big difference is the US was murdering countless Vietnamese to keep them under the boot of capitalism. The protesters in Tienanmen aren’t as black and white. If the protesters were protesting China poisoning the food supply and massacring countless villages of country on the other side of the planet to keep a country’s resources easy to exploit and their people’s blood ready to be spent keeping other countries under the boot of capitalism, it would be that simple, but they weren’t.

            Also “against authoritarianism” lmao you are a literal child.

              • Corn@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                11
                ·
                7 days ago

                Here, it’ll take two minutes to read this. I’m not even going to get into the contexts “authoritarianism” is and isn’t used today (hint: liberals use it and see no hypocrisy).

                • livingheart@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  12
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  7 days ago

                  do you think this is convincing, compelling? it is not.

                  it totally equates the democratic delegation of agency to elected delegates for a specific term and purpose with permanent subservience.

                  it’s an attack on strawmen, and you’re a born bootlicker if you’re this easily swayed into cheerleading for authoritarians.

                • QuoVadisHomines@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  10
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  7 days ago

                  Yeah Engels take on authoritarianism is dated and not really valid given that his ideologies do not result in anything other than authoritarian states IRL.

            • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              7
              ·
              edit-2
              6 days ago

              I’m always curious to compare how Americans view the Tianemen Square incident with Waco.

              Like, if you ask an American to explain what happened at Waco, you’ll get a bunch of blank stares. A few people with anti-government views will explain how a religious community was ruthlessly butchered by the Gestapo-like FBI. A few people with anti-religious views will insist this was a child sex cult that committed suicide while the FBI tried to help.

              But for the most part, those Americans who remember it just see it as another normal police action against people who were probably committing all sorts of crimes.

              You could also talk about the BLM protests from '14 to '18, and how the broad American view was that this was police acting to protect private property. And maybe some of the protesters didn’t deserve such rough treatment, but hey they knew what they signed up for when they blocked traffic.

              But the views on Tianemen are uniform. Chinese killed that nice man with their tank and then killed everyone else in the city and then covered it up in a way only people in China are unaware it happened.

            • Railcar8095@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              7 days ago

              “Chinese government killed their own people, it’s fine! They are basically property”

    • NotJohnSmith@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      I only see wiki reference 10 soldiers having died - is this the number you’re referring to?

      Do you think that’s alot? In my head that’s disproportionately few compared to the [disputed] 100s of civilians that the Chinese government declared dead

      • arcterus@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        27
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        According to the linked page with PLA/PAP casualties, there were 15 verifiable deaths (PRC official number is 23). Half of them weren’t directly caused by the protesters, and the other half occurred after troops first opened fire. Truly, I feel quite radicalized.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      7 days ago

      Killing the villainous authoritarian ork creature CCP is always virtuous and good and needs to be celebrated.

      Stopping a tank in front of an unarmed bicyclist until police pull him out of the way is unforgivable genocide.

      • chloroken@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        6 days ago

        I had to do it, these people don’t even read their own fake sources.