wholookshere
- 0 Posts
- 18 Comments
61·16 hours ago“well it doesn’t effect me directly other than my bottom line, so sucks for everyone else”
if all you have to say is that, have the day you deserve.
you missed the plot a little.
it’s not that it doesn’t have use cases. It burning the world down with it.
how much more water went down the drain cooling the requests you made? how about the electricity not going to local consumers but AI data centers.
all the computer components shortages…
that’s still before the fact you admitted you would have hired a human, and given them food on the table instead of a corporate giant to buy another mega yacht.
33·2 days agoso that’s not the same person you replied to. Nor am I.
no one said anything about legality.
but that this points known hackers at your door.
there’s a lot more to the article than open source
This is how liberty dies, with thunderous applause.
I think it’s the contradiction of trying to fight censor ship while also praising the US government, who is in a stream of heavy censorship. just look at that 60 min episode.
1·1 month agobush era regulations aren’t foreigners…
here’s the thing with Putin, he didn’t invent the flames, he just stoked them. The tea party was always this.
your quick to blame current problems on foreigners, while ignoring that those people came to the us BECAUSE of its existing imperialistic politics.
They’re at best a symptom of a larger problem.
ignoring the decades of previous history of home made American imperialism.
Iraq, Afghanistan, Vietnam,…
101·2 months agothe thing you have to remember is that the internet is built off the backs of furries and trans women.
that’s not to say that all tech workers are one of those two, but a lot of those two work in tech, specifically open source.
Don’t believe me? look up programer/Unix socks.
forgive my snarkiness. its usually the quickest way to this realization.
what has been published by deep seek is the music, not the software, the music.
can you show me the actual source code?
the human readable code, not the weights.
deleted by creator
no,
your changing the definition of open source software. which has been around a lot longer than AI has.
source code is what defines open source.
what deepseek has is open weights. they publish the results of their learning only. not the source that produced it.
I really wish there was one better than Gramerly and now this…
yes, because hording money got us into this mess.
Why should you Proffitt so much off what used to be other people’s labour, and now plagiarism machine.
why do you expect me to sympathize with you.
I make good money on my own, and I do my best to NOT find the cheapest solution out there for my problems, and look for more ethical ways to spend my money. Because I care about my impact on others over my money. it’s having humanity.