• 10 Posts
  • 1.08K Comments
Joined 9 months ago
cake
Cake day: April 10th, 2025

help-circle

  • … Imagine saying this regarding a male teacher aged 30/31 who groomed a 15 year old and 16 year old student, and got the 15 year old student pregnant.

    (This woman got pregnant by the 15 yo student she groomed… and she had that child.)

    “Oh I dunno, I guess some people are attracted to kids! 🤷 Its a bad thing to do though.”

    What the fuck.

    No, its a lot more than just a bad thing, merely immoral actions. Its three innocent lives massively damaged, thrown off course, poetentially fucked up for life, because of the manipulative and selfish actions of a person in a position of trust and authority absuing that trust and authority.

    And yeah its three lives, not two, because there’s no way this doesn’t massively negatively affect the life of her baby.

    https://www.news.com.au/lifestyle/real-life/news-life/former-maths-teacher-rebecca-joynes-banned-from-teaching-after-grooming-two-school-boys/news-story/0fe2070f15e4694d585491d7ea183cdb

    … this woman is a serial sexual predator, who pursued the second relationship after being investigated for the first one and more or less getting away with a slap on the wrist.

    Thats not just ‘immoral actions’, it’s basically downright evil, which, according to the judge of the most recent trial, was carried out with “breathtaking gall” and “astonishing arrogance.”

    Downplaying the magnitude of how fucked up this is, is itself fucked up.











  • The most humane thing to do would be to kill them somehow in one moment…

    This is a thing.

    https://easycleancook.com/how-to-kill-a-lobster-before-you-cook-it/

    1. The Rapid Destruction of the Central Nervous System

    One of the most humane methods of killing a lobster is referred to as the “stabbing method.” This technique involves quickly severing the lobster’s central nervous system, ensuring a fast and painless death.

    Procedure (tigger warning/NSFW?)

    Prepare the Lobster: Place the lobster on its back on the cutting board. Hold it firmly but gently to stabilize it.

    Identify the Right Spot: Locate the cross section of the lobster’s carapace (the hard shell) right behind the eyes. This spot contains nerve ganglia that, when severed, will cause a rapid death.

    Make the Cut: Using a sharp chef’s knife, make a swift incision right at the identified spot. Aim for a clean, quick cut to ensure that the nervous system is disrupted immediately.

    Confirm the Kill: After cutting, the lobster should not exhibit movement. If it does, wait for a few moments to ensure that the process has been effective.

    Basically yeah, as you say, cut its brain stem.

    There are chefs who know exactly how to do this, it just requires skill and precision.

    This ia arguably the proper way to prepare and serve lobster, as, when done correctly… well, beyond being the most humane method, it also produces the most flavorful dish.




  • Well no, IM has generally always defaulted to a norm of much shorter messages.

    But… fairly lengthy forum posts?

    Yeah, that used to be pretty common.

    And it used to be normal that if someone posted ‘I ain’t readin’ all that’, they would be mocked.

    Now, its the reverse.


    And also… yeah I am still baffled by people whose response to … an introduction message, on some kind of dating app/site… is to just laugh at how long it is.

    … I’d used OKCupid in its early days.

    Generally?

    If you took the time to actually read someone’s profile, and… write something, based on shared interests… that was … a good thing to do.

    Shows that you actually care.

    Now? Try to do the same thing?

    Apparently people can’t comprehend that an initial, long, introduction message, does not mean that all other messages will necessarily be as long, unless you explicitly tell people this.

    I keep encountering this kind of behavior.

    And I’m just doing the same thing I’ve been doing for … almost 2 decades?

    Like… for the record, it has ‘worked’ to at least some extent, I’ve had multiple year+ relationships that started from doing that…

    Just seems like more and more people are having a hostile response to a lengthy intro.



  • I was under the age of 10, for most of the 90s.

    I am the most ‘unsupervised internet access as a child’ person I know, lol.

    I just really really like computers, hahaha!

    … I also am arguably even worse than the ‘eternal september’, lol, as I hadn’t even gone through puberty when I first started talking to people online, via forums or AIM or mIRC or Ventrilo or what not.


    But as far as writing experience goes… you’re correct for a small subset of hyperliterate people, but generally your conclusion at this end is wrong.

    Americans, American adults read and write at an average of a 5th grade level.

    Around 15% of adults read and write at a 2nd grade level, functional illiteracy.

    Something like less than 5% of American adults can read multiple news articles about the same topic, and compare and contrast the way they’re differently presented, to determine bias and missing or emphasized details, differing framing, etc.

    When I went to college, this was referred to as having a collegiate level of literacy, post 12th grade literacy.

    Well, how many American adults have a bachelors degree or better, and have an accompanying collegiate level of literacy?

    Roughly 38% have a 4 year degree or better.

    Yet only about 5% of them can actually do critical analysis.

    So, roughly 87% of college degrees were given to people who did not actually learn how to think.

    You don’t seem to understand how seriously the entire education system has already collapsed, how many college degrees are half comprised of what older, educated folks would just call remedial high school classes.

    Our literacy numbers are comparable to those of what Trump refers to as ‘shithole countries’.


  • The possibly optimistic way of looking at this is that certified morons will let you know they are such, so, writing something of moderate length effectively serves as a kind of shit-test.

    Also, people seem to be mostly unaware that different formatting standards exist and make more sense for different viewing contexts.

    I write the vast majority of my lemmy posts on mobile, because I engage with lemmy via mobile.

    Every once in a while I get someone screeching at me about horrible formatting… it looks fine on mobile.

    Sometimes I get much more polite critiques or suggestions, and then I just usually explain ‘oh I use lemmy on mobile’ and that is generally an amicable conversation…

    But a good chunk of people are seemingly baffled and offended by the idea that anyone could be doing anything in a manner different from how they, personally, do it.



  • I have had multiple VPs ask me complex, technical questions, and then I write them a complex, explanatory answer…

    And the reply that I get back includes them literally just saying ‘I didn’t read anything that would have required me to scroll.’

    These were boomers.

    Fuck, man, ok, at that point, you’re just asking a question to waste my time, apparently?

    I’m not gonna dumb down concepts that can’t be dumbed down and still meaningfully answer the question.

    I was hired here because I have specialized skills, if you’re too stupid to understand them, maybe realize that good leadership is more about knowing when to defer to your trusted experts, than it is about feeling like you are in total control and understanding of everything, all the time.

    It really is no wonder why the entire economy is collapsing, the elites really are just pantomiming a caricature of having a job, doing a job, being an important person.

    We’ve 'boys club’d and nepotism’d our way into mass executive incompetence.