• 0 Posts
  • 31 Comments
Joined 3 months ago
cake
Cake day: January 29th, 2025

help-circle
  • No, see… we have to believe all rape victims, unless they’re talking about Michael Jackson - because he made great music.

    So, those guys who have repeatedly gone on record saying he raped them and had their lives absolutely ruined for it - they’re ‘just doing it for the publicity’ (which they’ve made clear they hate and has ruined their lives) and ‘for the money’ (which will never come because Jackson is personally bankrupt, and his estate is owned by other corporations/entities that they cannot legally make claims against).

    So they’re Schrödingers rape victims. They’re liars because they haven’t proved it in court, and they’re just money/fame hungry because they’re trying to prove it in court.


  • In my experience people primarily get annoyed at thread necro when it’s to ask/discuss something tangential to the initial thread. Just start a new one in that case, instead of potentially bumping notifications to several people for your barely-related issue/discussion.

    OTOH if it’s relevant info for a long dead thread then by all means add it or ask your query, that info could be valuable to someone with the same issue or it could be a pertinent update to an old discussion with new info.

    There’s nothing inherently wrong with necroing a thread though. Automated archiving of threads is mostly counter-productive. Like when I find a closed and locked thread on GitHub that I have a fix for I just go “oh well guess they can find the fix themselves”.







  • I thought I should check, for science - looks like they’ve improved search a lot since then. At least on Bing and DuckDuckGo* searching for beaver college only showed legit results even with Safe Search disabled, aside from one ebaumsworld joke link.

    *which I believe proxies searches anonymously through Google (I was corrected, it used Bing and several other sources but not Google)






  • USA was profiting quite nicely off Nazi Germany in World War 2 right up until the USA entered the war in 1941. Some historians argue there is nothing wrong with that. I think many would disagree.

    The US government at the time was lobbied heavily by business and private citizens (including the Nazi Party of America) to stay neutral in the war, so they largely did just that right up until Pearl Harbour made it so they could not turn away. There were exceptions, eg: oil and metals used for creating ammunition were agreed not to be sold as part of the Allied Agreement with the UK (and others) and boats coming in and out were blockaded. But even that didn’t stop big fans of fascism, such as the Texaco CEO at the time whom supplied oil to the Nazis up until late 1940.

    So, honestly I don’t think a lot has changed.

    I guess the US government wasn’t directly funding WW2, but they also didn’t care one bit until it affected them directly - it was making their donors money. Paralleled today the US govt at large doesn’t care, and primarily funds Israel for two reasons: protecting their oil interests in the middle east (business donors and strategic benefits), and every dollar provided in the budget is actually a voucher to go buy some weapons or military equipment from a US firm - so again, its to cynically drive military-industrial investment (strategic) and protect their business donors.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Business_collaboration_with_Nazi_Germany

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Torkild_Rieber


  • Yeah, means Signal would just not have a presence eg an office or local routing/CDN servers in the countries that demand backdoors.

    It would mean slower service for anyone in such countries, but the service would not stop working or become less secure.

    It’s negative either way, as it chips away at the legitimacy of private E2E chat, and legislators the world over seemed determined not to learn that there’s no such think as “backdoors, but just for the good guys”. You either have a resilient end-to-end zero trust encrypted system or you don’t.



  • People from Denmark also all learn English during school and have done since at least the 60s, which is why you found that only 15% of them can’t speak English. Over 50% of Danes correspond in English for their work and are confident they can read English news according to 2013 survey. The proportion of US Americans that can’t read AP News stories is honestly probably higher, with the US now at 21% illiteracy.

    AP News may be primarily US-focused news source, but they are a global news organization. They sell their stories via syndication to hundreds of other news organizations and newspapers worldwide, in multiple languages, and have done for a very long time. To decide that all their articles are automatically for US audiences is just wrong.

    Gaslighting is repeatedly presenting information that’s untrue to convince someone of an alternate reality. Literally not possible to do in a single message, and nothing I wrote is not factual.

    I only tried to let you see how Americentrist your response to OOP was, and your subsequent response is to weaponise victimhood to dismiss any introspection. I will not waste further time.



  • Democrats largely avoided identity politics in the last election, especially for Harris/Waltz campaign - whereas the MAGA and Republican camp was full of identity politic attacks on ‘critical race theory’, ‘wokeism’, ‘antifa’, ‘DEI’, ‘woke liberals’ and ‘leftists’ (each of which are undefinable terms to Republicans anyway). Results: they lost, and they still get idiotic posts like this one complaining that they identity-politicsed too hard.

    If you have specific examples of identity politics where you think Democrats went too far and lost their audience then by all means, share them - but I’m confident this is just the echoed opinion of some talking head.