I wanted to break the video game logic people were using. People write things like “This piece of paper says anyone can compete. Therefore the men’s group is really the Open group.”

People literally argue as if we live in a video game. They think they because they can Google what a law says, that the simulation automatically implements said law.

Nothing in the rules of chess say that men ought to harass women. Therefore, that fact is hidden from many people. A piece of paper doesn’t say it, so it’s invisible.

If someone lived in reality and they knew that men consistently harass women and that the world of men doesn’t do enough to stop it, then they probably wouldn’t believe that the men’s group is somehow the open group that welcomes all challengers.

Contestants must run through these brick walls, swim through the magma pool, climb the 50’ smooth steel wall, and jump the chasm before smashing the watermelon at the end! Only the top 8 killbots will move on to the next round.

Their Programming is now “we need to avoid WW3, Russia will nuke us, we need to avoid unnecessary bloodshed, it’s got nothing to do with us”

A bunch of them instantly became bleeding heart pacifists because wearing that hat let’s you say the things best things for the current news cycle.

I think I saw one or two people trying to say this has always been the conservative position. I mean what’s America first but being anti war? It’s like different trumpers just sit there in a plastic box waiting to be activated. Crickets when conservatives are doing X, Y, Z, but then suddenly these things appear when it’s convenient. Hey everyone, these magats didn’t call for political violence! These magats have always been against foreign wars!

My logic? People are acting like men’s divisions are the open divisions when it’s very much closed to anyone not wanting to endure constant harassment. I don’t think adding facts to the discussion implies any logic aside from the logic in valuing the truth.

Don’t forget when you were 5 years old and adults would tease you about marrying the girl you were playing with. It’s perfectly normal when they bring up heterosexual relationships with a child. They see two tiny children playing and they say, paraphrased, “you gonna bang her when you grow up? Teehee”

But telling children they can be gay or the gender they identify as is wrong, grooming, sexualizing children, etc.

We’re just supposed to enforce traditional roles I guess. If we want to teach kids who to fuck, we do it with traditional heckles like “are you two getting married when you grow up?”

Same chess where men creep on women and female grandmasters report being harassed whenever they try to compete alongside men?

I don’t think women feel welcome when you can accost them and if they say anything they’re just a bitch lying to cause problems.

Police get caught running searches on their ex girlfriends. Police are barely better than gangs and they’re using sophisticated tech to fuck with their local communities. Brilliant. Add the CEO of Flock to the list of persona non grata.

“If we assume X theorem is true, Y theorem is true, and lemma Z is true, then …”

This is actually about our models and seeing their incompleteness in a new light, right? I don’t think starting from arbitrary axioms and then trying to build reality was about proving qualities about reality. Or am I wrong? Just seems like they’re using “simulated reality” as a way to talk about our models for reality. By constructing a “silly” argument about how we can’t possibly be in a matrix, they’re revealing just how much we’re still missing.

Assume I read the article and then made a post.

I wonder what it means. If you search for music by Suicidal Tendencies then YouTube shows you a suicide hotline. What does it mean for OpenAI to say people are talking about suicide? They didn’t open up and read a million chats… they have automated detection and that is being triggered, which is not necessarily the same as people meaningfully discussing suicide.

Male wolf spiders may hang back and watch mating pairs from the shadows, learning how to successfully attract a mate. Just like us fr

I’d take the $1000 and then pay someone $100 to tell me I’m beautiful.

Even though corporations play with labels, I still think of it as “this single food item is not a substitute for a meal.”

But it’s silly to assume people will split most of this crap. It’s not like a bag of chips you can roll up for later, it’s molten-frozen astronaut food.

Where does the meaning come from? God? Are we in a video game where someone programmed words to have specific meaning? I never understood where the root authority comes from. Many people are using Nazi to describe fascists but if you can’t derive meaning from how people use words… where does the authority come from?

That’s a great question!

I do indeed read my posts back—how else would I proofread them? 🤖

They demanded bodies, then Hamas promised to deliver them, then Israel threatened to cut off all aid if they didn’t deliver the bodies, then Trump threatened to bomb Palestinians if they didn’t deliver the bodies, then Hamas delivered the bodies.

The exact opposite of how you get extremists like Hamas to stand down. They’re demanding Hamas disarm while demonstrating the war isn’t over.

Need jammers to confuse and break Teslas. They’re weapons designed to break laws and protect occupants at the expense of bystanders. Can’t be mad if a bystander redirects your Tesla into a ditch.

Data brokers are allowed to buy data from the dark web after our data is hacked. I saw a 1 million fine I think?

App store owners will use this or that, which will get hacked, then our data will be bought up, and then it will be endlessly repackaged and moved around. That’s why you can’t remove your data using those scam services; the moment it’s moved to another broker it’s fair game again. You’ll never scrub your data.

Your insurance will know what apps you installed. Walmart will know what apps you installed. Police bypass warrants by leasing this data from corporations like Flock. Just add it to the pile.

They never show the full version of this gif, where you can see the elevated section of road the driver is aiming for. Have people seriously never seen a highway overpass? Do you guys just assume that every highway uses offramps instead of jumps?

This is kinda funny. It’s like “Jesus was a white guy” mixed with “cis whites need to check their privilege”

The idea that you could go back in time as a nutritionally giant white guy speaking gibberish and fit in because white is a bit anti history.

If we’re sending people back in time it’s going to be Dwayne Johnson.