Citing something is NOT true is trying to prove the negative. Most regulations are just blanket requirements and don’t say each and every organization that has to follow it. Shit, we had to follow state regulations for pollution and waste control as well.

No they aren’t. Exemptions can be granted for small cutouts, but they are still held to federal regulations. A cup of fuel on the ground or any more than a drop of oil in the water triggers a mandatory reporting that the CO can be held personally liable for. Shit, they were breaking down office chairs with multiple dissimilar material components to recycle each material correctly. I’m sure there are multiple places that are getting away with not following requirements, but they are required to still follow federal laws regarding pollution and waste disposal.

The model knows what kids looks like and it knows what porn looks like. It is now more complex than the thought experiment, “the Chinese Room” because it can interpolate between two things it knows rather than basic request and response.

That doesn’t mean it has to be. It was, but that is a distinction. AI knows what children look like and AI knows what porn looks like. It is gross but it doesn’t mean there has to be a victim. There are, I’m sure, a ton of (pirated) medical journals and text books fed into many of them.

Aptly, the next word I can think of for a memory aid is SHAME.

A single data center is mid double digit MW. They want to build groups of DCs in one location. As someone else said, a nuclear reactor is honestly the most efficient way for them to operate eventually.

At least with Google, you can type and respond directly with the AI summary.

Or that it’s not and it’s a good way for the government to keep tabs on them à la ANOM. Me and my boys have been using PiGN. Find a bird, attach a note, hope it gets there. Anything else is a crapshoot about actually being secure.