🌞 Alexander Daychilde 🌞

We are a state and a commonwealth.

Yep. It’s a choice Apple users make^[1] when they choose Apple.

Sic semper tyrannis

Don’t you be stealing Virginia’s state motto!!! ;-)

(Even if it does belong to us all! How dare you!) :)

Alright, I can’t argue too strongly about those statements being investigated.

How about all the times I’ve seen MAGA people make threats like that and worse? Crickets? Thought so.

Oh, I thought that was the… just… regulat step. hehe.

I guess for some sort of vaguely-serious discussion^[1], without doing any research, I think Jesus / Jesus Christ has stably evolved to Gee, with some variants like Gee Whiz being pretty common. I think Gee Willikers was more common around the TV Batman era and so now it’s less said straight and more said ironically. heh. I can’t think of any other common “Gee [something]”… maybe “Geezie Kreezie”, but I’ve only heard that from Suzy^[2] Izzard, so not sure if that’s common or not. lol

It definitely got short; I wonder if we’d count a second word as it getting longer, or a second word replacing “Christ”. These are the types of inconsequential discussions I love. :)

Well, your English is much better than my Eastern European. :) No clue you weren’t a native English speaker, so there’s that <3

The post-step is “Geezie willikers!” :)

i owe my soul to the company store

Considering the origin is “Jesus”, “Jee” is technically closer spelling than “Gee”. Not that I have a dog in this race.

ahhhh, seriously knock knock let me in, that sounds delicious. If you’re not veggie, I’ll bring my family’s kedgeree^[1]. :)

Yeah, but why the fish and the banana? You have to explain that in more detail, my man.

hahaha. Thanks for the cool sunglasses, too. :)

Apologies mean “I made a mistake and I learned from it so it won’t repeat.”

At best it might not make the same mistake again if that memory is in the current context. But more likely: It will not remember.

Although latest Gemini in particular has much more room for “remembering” things, still.

But “I made a mistake”? It is not self-aware in any way shape or form to the degree where “I made a mistake” carries any real meaning.

or at my house,

KNOCK, KNOCK

And that’s just if he decides to “refurbish” one!

I’m not quite sure the conclusion matches the data. Obviously it matches “so far”, but… while I follow UK politics, I’m not versed well enough to confidently address my theory, but I feel that if this was US Presidents - the system is broken, and so no matter the party of the President, the oligarchs ensure they are the only beneficiaries of government, so satisfaction drops from the intiial hopes after election to the reality that our democracy is broken.

I wouldn’t be surprised if there is a similar effect in the UK is what I’m saying.

Not worth labelling a single pixel 🤣

Listen, kid, I’ve been on reddit since 2009. I hung out with the admins in IRC back in the day. I was a default mod for a while, and I’m the “father” of /r/nottheonion.

There’s plenty I don’t know about reddit and life in general, but on this topic, clearly I know a fuck ton more than you.

There was a time on reddit when self-promotion was against the rules. That rule was dropped something like a decade ago.

The simple fact is that - from at least the article’s telling - the subreddits wanted the content, and in that case, it is absolutely fine and encouraged for someone to submit.

There’s a guy making youtube reviews of restaurants in my local city’s subreddit. The content is popular - people like it. So we absolutely are happy to see him post. Is it self-promotion? Yes, technically. It’s also relevant to the subreddit and desired by the mods and members of the subreddit.

You’re like the people saying “dis a repost” when someone CROSS-posts. Note that reddit has a BUILT IN SYSTEM for cross-posting, but there are redditors who don’t know that.

So, little boy, you can take your condescension and /r/confidentlyincorrect along with /r/iamverysmart and fucking LEARN something, or go off and continue to be willfully ignorant.

Disclaimer: If the article’s reporting is incorrect and the subreddits considered it spam, well, that’s not what the article said, and I don’t otherwise have other knowledge of it, nor do I care enough to google for any other possible sources. But that’s the informatio you’re working off of as well, so there’s that.

PS: To add a light-hearted end: I’ll go to /r/dontyouknowwhoiam now :) (that name seems too long. Is that the right one/ Well, you probably know what I mean and I’m too lazy to look it up :P )

atta k

I feel weird that I read this correctly. hehe

But now that you mention it, I wonder if they’ll launch during the rebuttal. :|

wut

Unless the article is absolutely lying, it mentioned the subreddits wanted the posts and couldn’t overcome the sitewide ban (i.e. manually approving the content). Your comment is a really huge stretch there.