Pah! I think you’ll find we’re tired of listening to experts.

/s

Yes; more resiliency, decisions made closer to those impacted and more agility.

Awesome, thanks OP!

Source to explain? I’m lost :)

I’ve been giving this some thought and the only line I can see is banning the calls for violence against a individual or protected group.

I think anything more or less restrictive causes trouble.

Example points:

• Cannot discuss declaring war (voilence) on another country.
• Can never lie or can not cause harm = can not tell a joke.
• Cannot ban misinformation = who decides? In the 1960 being gay was illegal, should the gay right movement have been banned as misinformation?

Societies grow by challenging norms.

I think our weird society can be fixed by teaching critical thinking in schools and introspection. However, philosophers have been saying similar things for at least 2000 years and it hasn’t caught on yet.

Happy to discuss the above as I’d like to work the angles for a better line, if we think there is one.

Can you give us an example of point 1 with regards to hate speech? Or a call for violence against another?

Can you define “hurt”. Do you mean physically or emotionally? If the latter then I think it is too restrictive.

Im thinking of changing my daily driver for Win 10 to SteamOS. Any reason not to?

Good write up, thanks!

You have to agree to do it, but you don’t have to lay out a plan or timeline to do it.

Retirement age is one.

Antinatalism or anti-natalism is a philosophical view that deems procreation to be unethical or unjustifiable.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antinatalism

You could read the Red Mars series. It covers some of the points you’ve raised albeit it is Science Fiction.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mars_trilogy

God that game saying “Find Nathan Gould” over and over.