My Shit’s Fucked Up In My Ass.
No, I’m not kidding.
My Shit’s Fucked Up In My Ass.
No, I’m not kidding.
Good point and well said. Thank for the effort you made to write that up.
Aside from the fact that this is entirely fake- I’ll say…
If only.
No.
no one can prove if their sentient you know
And this statement just might be the best argument by example, that one could make in defense of that point.
They don’t want proof that what’s going to be happening soon, was ever mortally objectionable.
The next what girl?
I think you know exactly how empirically provable facts work. And I also think you’re a troll.
Yeah. 0 points. I either aced it, or I colossally failed it depending on perspective.
But they’re saying they do know. And they are correct.
I do know. It’s not sentient at all. But don’t get angry at me about this. You can put that all on science.
You know “Grok” is not a sentient being, right? Please tell us you understand this simple fact- because you just defended a computer program as deserving the same freedoms as a human being.
You didn’t vote to protect it, I don’t think you get to claim it. You abandoned it.
Discussion over.
I’m going to explain this for you as simply as possible:
So… Imagine a scenario where a driverless car is rolling towards a baby in a carriage. Now imagine there are 10 people, one of them being you- standing about within eyesight of the car that is heading towards the baby-
In this scenario:
The car = trump.
The baby = our democracy.
The 10 people = the only influence able to change the scenario.
Now, what ties this all together to make it more relevant is that we will now give the people standing about the choice to to push the car into the baby, do nothing, or stand in the way of the car in order to stop it.
This means that:
5 people that will push the car into the baby = Trump supporter.
1 person that will do nothing = you.
4 people that will push the car away = Harris voters.
So now… Here we have two groups of people that have no intent whatsoever to help the child in any way. One- directly and the other indirectly- and only one group that is trying to stop the car.
Those standing around watching, (you) could help stop the car- but don’t. Thereby watching the car roll over the child because not enough people helped stop it.
You made the choice to withdraw your help and thereby share in the responsibility.
He won that tournament in the same way his puppeteer Putin “wins” an election.
Is that an actual sentence?