Pro@programming.dev to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 13 days agoWe Should Immediately Nationalize SpaceX and Starlinkjacobin.comexternal-linkmessage-square503fedilinkarrow-up11.2Karrow-down1117
arrow-up11.09Karrow-down1external-linkWe Should Immediately Nationalize SpaceX and Starlinkjacobin.comPro@programming.dev to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 13 days agomessage-square503fedilink
minus-squareKnock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up21arrow-down1·12 days agoNasa with less risk aversion. If a Nasa rocket blows up that’s big news. If a Space X rocket blows up, that’s a Tuesday.
minus-squarenutsack@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·12 days agoyeah but if SpaceX becomes NASA then what
minus-squarePollo_Jack@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·12 days agoLearn from SpaceX progress. Return to NASA risk aversion. Trial new designs in 20 years, repeat.
minus-squareInternetCitizen2@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·12 days agoWhich is the advantage of SpaceX. As it is people are looking to cut money for NASA. Still, NASA has always subcontracted out, so absorbing SpaceX does not seem like it might change much (outside of public opinion)
deleted by creator
Nasa with less risk aversion. If a Nasa rocket blows up that’s big news. If a Space X rocket blows up, that’s a Tuesday.
yeah but if SpaceX becomes NASA then what
Learn from SpaceX progress. Return to NASA risk aversion. Trial new designs in 20 years, repeat.
Which is the advantage of SpaceX. As it is people are looking to cut money for NASA. Still, NASA has always subcontracted out, so absorbing SpaceX does not seem like it might change much (outside of public opinion)