cross-posted from : https://lemmy.zip/post/71321898

Netzpoltik details that police are able to gain access in this way either through physical access to someone’s phone or by intercepting verification codes via a state-sanctioned phishing attack or intercepting SMS messages via telephone surveillance

  • time2lose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Telegram and whatsapp never had encryption. Also - they just give your messages on law enforcement request, always have.

    Signal - how does it work with signal again?

    • FriendOfDeSoto@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      They are a bit vague on this but I suspect all of these attack vectors start with LEOs having physical access to the unlocked phone. They then set up a trusted desktop without the phone owners knowing.

      Which is clever, to be fair. Whether or not that’s legal is already a court case. The law is so frightfully grey.

      • peopleproblems@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Its also a failure of the user’s access control and operating security.

        Once a third party has access to the secure environment, that environment is and will always be compromised.