• artyom@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    19 hours ago

    I am not “licking boots”, I am discussing facts. And I’m gonna keep doing it.

    There’s so many examples of them using unauthorized access even long before llm’s were a thing

    Sure, there’s an endless list of awful things they’ve done, but that’s not what’s being discussed here.

    • DillDough@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      16 hours ago

      I’m not talking about random awful things they’ve done I’m talking specifically about unauthorized access issues which is literally what you named as being the difference. Get some reading comprehension.

      • artyom@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        14 hours ago

        I’m talking specifically about unauthorized access issues which is literally what you named as being the difference.

        Correct, that is the difference between what I said and what the author said. The author is talking about scraping. Get some reading comprehension. You don’t even have to read the article, it’s literally in the title.

        • Tim_Bisley@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          8 hours ago

          If an AI company ignores robot.txt exclusions and scrapes a site, then turns around and sells that content as a service, is that unauthorized access?

        • DillDough@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          9 hours ago

          The article is trash, we’re talking about your comment, hence why I replied to you. You lied just like the article did.