This is the same Wall Street Journal that is owned by NewsCorp? The multimedia company operated by Rupert Murdoch as a propaganda machine for right wing fascist policy and heavily tried to influence government to favor the ultra wealthy and hive them power. That Wall Street Journal?
Sub 50k Beats Trump by 31 points
100k+ beats Trump by 38 points
Isn’t there someone else in the room you are forgetting to ask?
1,000,000,000+ currently planning the municipal level sequel to the business plot.
Ah, so they are now in the committed and loving stage of the relationship.
Understandable actually that MAGA and the GOP would have no fucking clue what that’s about.
Good, the honeymoon is over. Mamdani’s actions as mayor are no longer shocking, they are business as usual. Now the MAGAs and the Corpo-Establishment Dems can just stand there, while he makes them look like fools as he defies their predictions of a Socialist hell hole.
A recent poll that showed that 30% of Dems now identify as Democratic Socialists. That was about two weeks ago. I’ll bet its even higher now. This is the wave of the future of the Democratic Party. They better get on, or they’ll be left behind.
Selectively leaving out 50k-100k income, aka the middle class. Hmm…
Its NYC I’m pretty sure 100k is middle class there. Lower middle class.
The establishment in 'Murica are genuinely terrified of his success
If he shows that it’s possible, then they’re afraid that other places will want the same
When’ Muricans travel and actually experience what it’s like to live somewhere else, the smart few start making plans for their escape to the civilised world
They’ve bombed, blockaded and invaded other countries for less.
the smart few start making plans for their escape to the civilised world
If by “the smart few” you mean highly sort after professionals, such as PHDs. We’re often seeing the opposite, a majority of them seek locations at which they’ll get the highest pay - Which tends to be USA, due to the exploitation of everyone beneath them
Except we have lost more than 10,000 STEM PhDs from federal departments since Trump entered office, outnumbering new hires 11 to 1 (https://www.science.org/content/article/u-s-government-has-lost-more-10-000-stem-ph-d-s-trump-took-office)
And 15% less PhD applicants, 21% less of foreign PhD applicants (https://www.chemistryworld.com/news/losing-an-entire-generation-of-scientific-talent-top-us-universities-accepted-15-fewer-phds/4023877.article)
Usually people come here for work when trained at that level, but we are quickly heading towards a “brain drain” of losing our highly educated population.
Except we have lost more than 10,000 STEM PhDs from federal departments since Trump entered office
And where did they go? Silicon Valley, Europe or China? This doesn’t necessarily mean the US has less PHDs available.
And 15% less PhD applicants, 21% less of foreign PhD applicants
We can hope the 21% drop of foreign applicants for PHD programmes, is reflecting the job market. But I’ve not seen any data suggesting Silicon Valley having bigger trouble than usually attracting talent when flying million dollar a year contracts in their faces.
OpenAI, Google, Meta and all the other jazz is still attracting the talent. Unfortunately.
This doesn’t necessarily mean the US has less PHDs available
It actually does. That’s how math works. If you have X - 10,000, your result is less than X
That’s just one employer, not all American employers.
I’d say WSJ is captured but it never really was un-captured.
It has gone total MAGA since Trump 1.0 though.
WSJ is Murdoch owned. Purchased in 2007. Hasn’t “gone” anything, it’s fucked pre trump
Murdoch media created Trump
The last time I took WSJ seriously was before 2007.
He accomplished more good in a few months than trump did in almost 6 years. I also haven’t heard him constantly blame the last guy for all his failings. +1 for this new mayor!!
He accomplished more than basically any politician in the last 20 years in the us.
And he actually geta booed off stage, while trump sometimes has a guy booing, and the title is: trump slammed by getting booed by a whole stadium
What?
I searched a bit, the main thing I can find is that 7 days ago, Mamdani appeared on stage at an event in Staten Island, where he only got 23% of the vote. Multiple (at least 4) people booed him, and he left the podium/stage after roughly a minute during which he thanked various people.
So… He went to a borough where he wasn’t very popular, and he still isn’t very popular there, I guess? This is just like the ending of my own relationship’s honeymoon phase, when my sister in law that has never liked me, still didn’t like me after I got married.
Honeymoon phase OVER!! Stable, long term relationship phase built on mutual respect has STARTED.
I’d like to call for a vote for the following motion:
LazyBaby to be renamed BasedBaby.
I vote FOR the motion.
Beat me to it. No longer are they dreaming of what things will look like, they are seeing the results and the reality of what it looks like to have someone actually care about their well being. May we all be so lucky, honestly.
Could you imagine if we got used to that? Started to expect functional government? It’s so refreshing to have even one decent example. I want it so bad.
The best part of the relationship comes after the honeymoon phase ends, when the initial excitement and passion gives way to comfort, familiarity, and long-term stability.
But I don’t expect right-wingers to understand that. They’re kinda hedonic and self-centered, for all their talk of “family values”…
No way! There’s LOTS of… um… {insert preferred term for “strenuous activities” here} left to return to the ruling class. The fun(d)s just getting started! Endless Honeymoon!
WSJ is so desperate to be relevant again they are straight up printing obvious lies.
It is the Murdock way
WSJ editorial board are basically an anti-progress FUD campaign committee and always have been. They spent the entirety of Bill de Blasio’s (Second best NYC mayor in my life) double term desperately trying to tear him down, too. They’re also the origin of the term “bike lobby” or more specifically “The all-powerful bike lobby” in reference to an imaginary and shady organization supposedly responsible for getting share bikes and bike lanes onto the street. WSJ is a rag.
WSJ has a bad case of MDS: Mamdani Derangement Syndrome
Americans need people like him. I’ve hated hard on yanks but he goes to show that there is hope for you, after all
I’ve always liked the CSJ (Canal Street Journal) better.
The sexiest percent favorability. Nice!
And since The Constitution says Trump can’t run again, it doesn’t matter that The Constitution says Mamdani can’t run either!
I would vote for Mamdani for president.
Non-american here, why wouldn’t Mamdani not be able to run for president?
Gotta be born American.
Like, there’s been debate about children of US military born overseas, even in a US military base which is for all intents legally American soil.
Edit:
And to clarify, Mamdani ain’t trying to change that
People just started saying it.
children of US military born overseas
The debate about what natural-born means has often been confusing to me.
The USA does both, Jus Soli and Jus Sanguinis to determine citizen status at birth. But when it’s about eligibility for president, suddenly extra weight should be put on Jus Soli being the only real proper form of citizenship? That makes no sense to me.
I thought natural-born would mean citizen at birth, not immigrated and naturalized. To avoid situations where for example some English noble immigrates and naturalizes in name only, uses his wealth to gain political power, and then puts the US back under English influence. It makes sense to me that the founders of a new republic would want to avoid having it twisted by former masters.
You mean Boris Johnson?
Not sure if i agree with that rule but if that’s what the majority of the people want; sure, why not.
The people were never given an option to vote on this, and it’s been a thing longer than any living person.
This isn’t to say it’s a bad rule. I haven’t made up my mind. However, it’s not as good as a rule like one making the president divest from any business interest, as an example, and we don’t have that. If we’re not going to have a rule like that then I don’t see any reason why a foreign born person shouldn’t be allowed to be president. If it’s about loyalty, surely loyalty to yourself exceeds loyalty to some other country of birth for most people, so that needs to be resolved more.
When they made (it’s an amendment) it made sense to limit foreign influence.
We still have foreign influence, but imagine an America where a dictator is deposed so they get refugee status and seize power legally. That is why the amendment passed.
Especially in the early days, America was worried about what would become our bread and butter.
The truth about Mamdani is America is full of people eligible to be president who would do just as good of a job.
The risk outweighs the reward.
Mamdani could still be a senator, and serve as long as he’s elected.
Like, part of fixing our government, is taking a shit ton of power away from the president. We can’t really do that till we get a progressive Congress, but that’s the end goal, we don’t want consolidated power, because that makes it easily corrupted.
If we don’t limit Presidential power, we know Republicans and neoliberals never will.
While there are amendments that affect who can be president, the rule that you must be a natural born citizen is from the original text of the Constitution:
[Article II, Section 1, Clause 5]
No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.
It is naive to think the way the system works is because the majority want it to work this way.
States aren’t ruled by public opinion. Public opinion is ruled by states.
IIRC, can’t be a naturalized citizen.
Only USAian born citizen can be elected, Mamdani was born in Uganda. That’s why there was the whole conspiracy theory about Obama being born in Haiti
USAian
If it was just American soil, then any soil of the Americans would count.
But it’s specifically only the soil of the country USA, which indeed does not unite America
