• panthera_@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    12 hours ago

    NATO would not be able to stop the US militarily since Greenland is near the US. However. it would be the end of NATO, something which Trump doesn’t really care about.

    • idiomaddict@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      You mean they couldn’t physically or legally? Because they probably won’t be able to physically prevent the first shovel from breaking ground due to the relative locations of NATO members, Greenland, and the US (though maybe Canada), but they could come to Greenland and legally force the drilling company to leave before there’s much of an impact (assuming the oil company didn’t come with mercenaries).

      • panthera_@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Denmark alone could do that, but Denmark has to anticipate a plan if the US send in troops to protect the drilling company.

        • idiomaddict@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Yeah, Denmark should do that. I’m not trying to be contrary, I just don’t see what prevents Denmark from making a plan with Greenland to have security forces nearby (ideally with some other NATO members as a show of force) to arrest any unlawful drillers without paramilitary escorts, and to force a confrontation with any armed groups not explicitly authorized to be there.