• chilicheeselies@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    11 hours ago

    If you are building a new machine for home use and not starting with Linux it’s crazy to me. The worst that can happen is you try it for a month or two, hate it, and then buy a windows license.

    • Smoogs@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      9 hours ago

      Even at that you can dual boot. You could ween yourself from one to the other to build a daily driver. As Linux has several windows emulators(heroic for example) that you can install and run all your fav window programs anyways.

      Linux is like so zero risk it is ridiculous.

  • Sam_Bass@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 hours ago

    purely a cash grab. in no universe of reality is software so tied to memory that it requires a price hike

  • Loce@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    1 day ago

    A year of Linux desktops indeed. I’ve switched PC and a laptop to Linux and guess what? Works better, faster, more secure and I fucking love it.

    Never ever going back to Windows. I might run win10 in virtual pc, but never main host and nothing => 11

    • PangurBan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      7 hours ago

      Yepppp.

      Played around with all of them for a bit. Settled on Bazzite. Dead simple to install and use and it has t given me any issue at all.

      Pop OS was kind of nice too, but it needs another year in the oven.

  • T156@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    24 hours ago

    Microsoft seems intent on pushing people to alternatives. Not only did they quietly remove the higher RAM recommendation, but now the OS is more expensive.

    So what people are likely to get an underpowered computer that costs more if they have to buy a new laptop. On the tail of Apple recently releasing a relatively nice and cheap laptop to much fanfare, no less.

    It sounds like we’re about to see a repeat of the Windows Vista days. Where people hate Windows because it’s slow and horrible, and it is slow and horrible because it’s running on an underspecced machine barely meant to run the previous version of windows.

  • doingthestuff@lemy.lol
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    They’re trying to kill the home PC. They’ll have all of the computing power and we’ll have subscription access.

      • Bluewing@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Look at the long game. Installing a Linux distro is great. But what happens when your GPU/CPU/SSD dies and you can’t afford or buy replacements?

        They got more time and can afford to wait us out.

        • An1m4L@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 hours ago

          old hardware still runs great on linux. they’ll have to force windows apps on people and linux will prolly run them as well.

        • jnod4@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 hours ago

          Or when they lock the bootloader ala android phones and you’re stuck with the default Windows on your laptop?

    • Mataresian@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      Sure in terms in computing power. But Microsoft still needs you to be able to access a windows device so that they can push you onto their subscriptions. I think in this case, they think people will just cough up the extra costs to get windows. Of course at one point even regular people will consider Linux. And that is when Microsoft will break.

      • doingthestuff@lemy.lol
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 day ago

        I feel like Linux needs to be just a little bit more accessible to the tech-illiterate too. It is getting closer but go show some uninitiated person a Linux forum where power users are talking about maintaining their system daily or weekly, the average person is going to still nope out. I run Linux and and Windows, but if Mac could run more games I’d think about giving them a try because they all suck in their own special way.

        • An1m4L@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 hours ago

          for regular people all they need to do is accessible through gui. it’s just a matter of being open to change.

        • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 hours ago

          but go show some uninitiated person a Windows forum where power users are talking about maintaining their system daily or weekly, the average person is going to still nope out.

          The OS is immaterial, showing anyone uninitiated the shit power users do, you’ll get that reaction. If you show me, a professional windows admin and a homelab linux admin, a Mac power user forum and my eyes will cross. But for windows or potentially Linux, it’s fine. Don’t use the users’ lack of understanding as a mark against it, because that same mark is on every OS.

          Linux itself has been usable by the tech illiterate for over a decade. My dead mother could use it just fine after I got sick of reinstalling windows, and she’s been gone damned near that long. Sure, they have to have assistance in getting it installed right now because even the windows terminal terrifies them, but get it installed and a base configuration in place and it takes care of itself for the most part.

        • Mataresian@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          20 hours ago

          Some distros are surprisingly accessible to be honest. And with the enshitification of windows people will be very tempted or pushed to make step to Linux. And when the crossover point is there is can go really quickly. More an more companies are deciding that the cost of Microsoft alone is worth the migration. Exposing even more people to Linux. My biggest barrier is that some online games won’t run on Linux but if that changes then why not.

          • Rooster326@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            8 hours ago

            I don’t even think most people know what Linux is.

            My daughter met a child named Linux at a park. The Parens thought they came up with the most unique name ever. They had absolutely no idea. Bruh…

  • Hueristic_Autistic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Lmfao, here comes manufactures selling their own versions of Debian and Fedora. I bet we’re going to see a rush of manufacturers selling blank no OS PC’s with hardware being the only added on cost.

    • ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      I’ve been hearing Linux music for the past 9 years lol it’s incredible how much it’s improved as a desktop OS over that time.

    • Argyle13 @lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      This. Linux use on the USA is now over 10% in computers. And growing. I hope Europe follows the same path, but it is slow. Growing also. At home we all have ditched Windows years ago.

    • lemmyvore@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      Let’s be honest… people who can’t figure out how to deal with Windows licenses wouldn’t be able to deal with a switch to Linux either.

      • Krzd@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 day ago

        This is about OEMs, which realistically only have 2 choices: Either sell it with windows, or Linux pre-installed.
        The general public isn’t going to buy a device without an OS installed.

        • lemmyvore@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          1 day ago

          People that can rub two neurons together have figured out they can get their 10yr old nephew to install something for them… so the included OS means nothing besides how it affects the final price. They’ll buy a laptop with Windows/Linux/no OS or whatever on it. In markets that don’t allow computing devices to be sold without an OS it doesn’t even have to be Linux, the vendors and manufacturers will happily slap FreeDOS on it to bypass the regulation.

      • Lordran_Hollow@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Shit, even those who do know Windows will find it daunting.

        I just bought a PC over the weekend to replace my PS5 (because fuck Sony) and I installed SteamOS onto it.

        I am having a hell of a time figuring it out. It’s such an alien OS to me as a lifelong Windows user. I’m still trying to learn how everything works, like udev rules and the file structure/hierarchy it uses. It’s mad confusing, normal/less tech savvy people definitely wouldn’t be able to handle it.

        • lemmyvore@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          16 hours ago

          udev rules is a bit of a deep end dive tbf. There are enough Linux distros where you can stick to the desktop most of the time.

        • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          24 hours ago

          I’d suggest Bazzite instead, still gaming oriented but it’s a lot more user friendly than SteamOS which is moreso designed with the steam deck and steam machine in mind.

          • Lordran_Hollow@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 hours ago

            Yeah, a friend of mine well-versed in Debian suggested I switch to Bazzite.

            The main issue I was having with SteamOS is I couldn’t wake the PC up from sleep with a wireless peripheral of any kind. Went into BIOS and made all the necessary changes and whatnot.

            As much as I absolutely despise it, AI was able to assist me with a udev script that worked first try. I was mainly hoping to get my 8bitdo Pro 3 to wake the system since it had a 2.4ghz dongle/station, but even my PS5 controller can wake it now via Bluetooth, no matter how much time has passed.

            Now that I don’t really need to worry about switching to the desktop, it’s been a pretty great experience so far.

        • Aeder@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 day ago

          SteamOS is not meant to be used on normal desktop/laptops. You’re making things harder for yourself.

        • SabinStargem@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          Personally, what I hate about Linux is terminals and having even less reliable information about what has gone wrong. I will revisit Club Penguin in a couple of years, provided that Valve has further expanded SteamOS to the desktop PC.

          In the meantime, I am using Windows Enterprise via Masgravel activation, installed via RUFUS, and paired with ShutUp10 to improve privacy without having to be a guru. ShutUp10 also has a paid version that automatically reverts changes that Microsoft does to privacy settings.

  • billwashere@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    1 day ago

    I have no idea why this makes sense? What about hardware getting more expensive justifies the license for software going up? Is this just because they can?

    • An1m4L@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 hours ago

      they’ll prolly leave the home users alone and charge companies that have no option but to cough up. for now…

    • jj4211@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 day ago

      Volumes are going to be down, but they want the same revenue, so they increase unit price, comfy in the reality that it will still be, percentage wise, not worth it for most to care. Will it make it unaffordable for some? Probably not appreciably more than the hardware is doing all by itself.

      So in short, it is just because they can.

    • hexdream@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      It makes sense in terms of opportunism, greed, and for laying three groundwork for a future where you do not own your own computer but do everything in the cloud (because that is where the power is). Remember the whole “you will.own nothing and be happy” thing… so same argument as when businesses moved from self hosting on site. Short version, they want you with a subscription for everything and they can control everything you do.

    • Tja@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      Pretty much. If hardware is constant lly going up and consumers put up with it, why not get a slice of the pie? It’s not like an OEM buyer will reconsider just because of a few bucks for Windows, if they were going to buy anyway.

  • azvasKvklenko@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    To me this is positive news. The less appealing Windows machines are, the better. Let Windows PC rot peacefully.

    • MrMcGasion@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      While I understand your sentiment about Windows, this is how you end up in a world filled with iPad kids who become adults who accept technology that they don’t own.

  • Zedstrian@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    309
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    More OEMs should ship devices with Linux as an option, discounted by the Windows license cost.

    • edgemaster72@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      135
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      OEMs: Sorry, best I can do is tripling the amount of pre-installed bloatware that I get kickbacks on, to not only offset the cost but raise profits more

    • morto@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      87
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Here in Brazil, a lot of vendors are offering laptops with linux, but they do this just to offer a lower price, and put the most weird distro possible, that no one knew existed, so everyone who buys have to install their own os. The bad thing about it is that it creates a really bad first impression about linux on common users, who mostly end up asking the tech person from the family to install windows for them

      Edit: another random fun fact: in order to offer a lower price, some brands around here also ship laptops with freedos, don’t ask me why.

      • zarathustrad@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        39
        ·
        2 days ago

        Why don’t they just install Mint, Zorin, or even xUbuntu (XFCE versions of each)…

        That’s 3 examples with actual support and a user base >3 edgelord cat bois.

        • morto@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          1 day ago

          I ask myself the same question. I have no idea. Mine is from vaio and came with some sort of modded debian that looked like a stripped down win xp with custom repos that didn’t even load properly.

          • mrbutterscotch@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            17 hours ago

            You’d think that installing a niche distro like that is more difficult than one of the big ‘plug and play’ ones. Meaning they actively put more work into it, how strange.

        • RogueBanana@piefed.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          2 days ago

          Most distro maintainers would expect something for commercial licences. Can’t have them take all your hard earned money! Max I can do is 0$.

          • VAK@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            1 day ago

            They’re usually gpl licensed. You can do whatever you want with it (including selling it for a bazillion monies) as long as you give the code too.

        • morto@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 day ago

          Exactly, but if we think about it, just putting some random well-established distro would be faster and cheaper than creating their weird modded versions or making contracts with weird firms. Maybe they want to avoid any unexpected legal issues?

          • Dagnet@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 day ago

            Maybe it has some known vulnerabilities? The more reputable sellers I’ve seen around here (I’m also from. Brazil) just ship Ubuntu, it’s usually the sketchier vendors with the weird distros

            • morto@piefed.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 day ago

              Which brands have you seen shipping with ubuntu? I’ve seen vaio, samsung, asus and acer shipping with weird distros. They come like that even from the official stores.

      • Dudewitbow@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        2 days ago

        im surprised they don’t just do the underhanded method of acquiring windows.

        well I’d imagine theres some stores willing to oblige doing that.

        curious sakes, what distro do they preload on customers.

        • steelplatedmech@piefed.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 days ago

          Yeah I doubt my chinese MiniPC came with official Windows. Had recommendation tp go through initial set up offline. Not that I kept Windows. I wiped it and put Fedora on it.

        • morto@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          Around here, institutions are quire rigorous with that, so stores have to play by the book. Only very small shops can sell pirate software without getting caught

          About the distros, Each brand seem to put a different one, and they’re all weird. Mine came with some sort of modded debian with alternate repos, but was very impractical for use, and ended up installing fedora over it.

        • jaygray91@piefed.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 days ago

          Yeah that’s weird. Quite a few of the smaller refurb shops here (south East Asia) just pirate Windows and Office suite.

    • ms.lane@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      37
      ·
      2 days ago

      The problem there is Windows still has negative cost for OEMs due to all the bloatware they bundle.

      They get paid for that McAfee and Epic Games icon.

    • Brkdncr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      They used to have agreements to make it difficult to do so. I don’t know if that’s still the case but it’s pretty awful. I think OEMs had to pay licenses for every machine shipped regardless if it had a windows license.

      The other issue is that oems have a large amount of compatibility and support built up over the years for windows. They also know their customers can deal with Microsoft for “support” and ignore driver and support costs for whatever distro of Linux they were to choose.

      Sure an OEM could lead the way and show everyone else the path to freedom but think of the shareholders

      • Cricket@lemmy.zip@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        They used to have agreements to make it difficult to do so. I don’t know if that’s still the case but it’s pretty awful. I think OEMs had to pay licenses for every machine shipped regardless if it had a windows license.

        Correct.

    • saltesc@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      The Framework laptops have been selling out with backlog orders now. But with new models recently out, all the Linux ones sold out well before the Windows ones.

      I think it just kind of goes to say, if you know a bit about computers, Linux is a go-to. Of course those that are a bit tech-savvy as well would just get a Windows one, clear it off and install the distro of their choice. Plus once upgrade is done, my OS and files are all there like nothing happened. Things like setting up Windows again on a new device or new install is like a full day task.

    • adarza@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      they actually make money on many of those windows preinstalls due to all the bullshit they get paid to put on.

      • imecth@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        The fun part is that they can bundle an equal amount of bloatware on linux for even more revenue.

        • Aeder@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          The actually funny part is that they can’t. Most of the bloatware is not available on Linux because it doesn’t support it.

          • imecth@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            I’m not sure what you mean… linux “supports” bloatware just fine, it’s just that we don’t have much of that kind of software (yet), and i’m sure they could get it all to run through winboat or somesuch if they really wanted to.

  • Fmstrat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    2 days ago

    This is the way of the world right now.

    “Oh no, things are going bad for us, raise prices so we will be OK when this dies!”

    Screw the future. Sad times.