• mobyduck648@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    8 hours ago

    Medical AI is usually more along the lines of ‘we’ve created a proprietary model for computer aided diagnostics specific to x disease being scanned with y modality and we’ve taken this through the regulatory process in z jurisdiction’ than ‘put your symptoms into an LLM lol’.

    • joe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 hours ago

      There are studies that show that LLMs (chatbots) perform as well or better than human physicians.

      I’m not suggesting getting rid of physicians, though. This is a tool for humans, not a replacement.

      • Sally Strange@eldritch.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 hours ago

        @joe if it’s a tool for doctors to use then it will simply increase the costs of providing care even if there is an increase in the quality of that care. That means adoption of that particular type of “AI” will be limited. If it’s possible to replace doctors with a chatbot, that will decrease costs even if the quality of care also decreases.

        Which one do you think is more likely to be widely used in a profit-driven, anti-human system?

        @mobyduck648

        • joe@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 hours ago

          These are concerns with the healthcare system, not concerns with AI.

          • Sally Strange@eldritch.cafe
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            5 hours ago

            @joe they are not separable. Just like concerns about fair compensation for visual artists and writers are inseparable from “AI”.

            Noted: my question remains unanswered.