Its a space of 1meter×1meterx1meter, basically a cubic meter where the matter replicator works on. (So, no replicating cars, since its too big)

How do you min-max this?

  • toxic_cloud@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    edit-2
    19 days ago

    Day 1: create 264 gallons of water (probably enough for a month)

    Day 2: create a cubic meter of food (also probably enough for a month)

    Day 3 to next rationing: spend thinking of all the awesome things I could create but end up getting overwhelmed and doing nothing instead

    • Phoonzang@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      19 days ago

      Additional day 3: be overjoyed that you can just replicate your basic needs, so you now can work less (or not at all). All that free time! Think of all the projects xou could do!

      Start by replicating junk food and beer and sloth around until the evening of Day 29, panic, make plans for some way to big Project for Day 30. Day 30 replicate stuff you need for the project. Before properly starting, realize you forgot to buy replicate some crucial stuff but home depot is now closed you’ve already used the replicas quota, be discouraged, overwhelmed, give up, promise “next month is going to be different!”.

  • KoboldCoterie@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    20 days ago

    Get together with your neighbor, replicate the parts of each other’s replicator. Repeat this daily for a bit. Exponential growth. Give it a month or so, then just go ham and make everything you want, maybe after renting a warehouse to keep them all in.

    • tal@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      20 days ago

      If you can disassemble them, this is probably a good way to eliminate bounds on throughput, but honestly, even a little coordination permits for pretty enormous throughput from the get-go. You’ve got a lot of people out there.

    • Postmortal_Pop@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      20 days ago

      I feel the upper limit of this is probably depends on how many simultaneously unrelated things you can put on the print bed at once. Like, can I have it print me a pair of shoes, 6 sandwiches, an SD card and a bag of cat kibble all at once? Or is it going to make 6 SD kibble card sandwiches on shoe-bread? 1m³ will hold my entire groceries list for the week, but if I have to print each item individually I’ll starve.

      • KoboldCoterie@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        20 days ago

        Well… 1m^3 of rice, then the next day 1m^3 of beans, then the next day 1m^3 of potatoes, etc. - you might not like what you’re eating for the first few days, but I think you could pretty quickly accumulate enough ingredients in massive quantities to make some pretty nice meals, even if that limitation does exist.

        • GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          19 days ago

          Or get together with a few neighbors, each person makes one of the basic necessities on the first day, you all split it evenly, and now you can make decent-well balanced food from day 1.

          Now make enough food to give you time for a project. A complete car engine can fit within 1 m3. So can 4 wheels. Power is going to be a problem, but you could probably make 20 solar panels at once. Now your power problems are solved. And if you have solar power, you might as well make some batteries. How much power can 1 m3 of sodium batteries hold? Not enough? Well, then make another.

          So now you have food and power, and you can make a car if you really want. Or you can make an electric scooter in one day. A recumbent electric bike might take 2, and an enclosure for it might take a couple more.

          You’re now 2 weeks in, have a month’s supply of food or more left, all your power needs met, transportation. What’s next? Well, the bad news is your TV will have to be slightly smaller than 60" if you print it from corner to corner in the replicator, but that isn’t a bad size. If multiple things can be printed at once, you can also print a high-end computer and VR kit. If not, this might take a couple days extra. Print a small fridge or two, or, better yet, a stackable fridge freezer set. What, those don’t exist? Make them, or get the designs from someone else. Make a nice stove if you don’t have one. Now your food creation and storage options are completely covered, as well as home entertainment. Might as well make yourself some nice furniture, comfort is key, and don’t forget the bed. Make some nice clothes, too.

          So you’re about a month in and food is running out. So make some more food before you run out. After that, start adding real luxuries. Spices, seasonings, cookware and other home incidentals. At this point, you probably only need to replace consumables. You should have been doing this earlier, but talk to your neighbors and friends. Visit their places, try new foods, get new ideas for how to make your life better, keeping in mind that doesn’t just include stuff.

    • rmuk@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      18 days ago

      Have the replicator print a replicator that auto-prints identical copies of itself as often as it can so you can cause the collapse of reality without having to be involved.

      Hell, have the replicator print a replicator without the 24-hour cooldown to hurry things along a little

  • Can I adjust dimensions? Like, can I replicated a car, but a tiny one that will fit in a 1x1x1m cube?

    If so, I’d replicate 1/8th of the replicator, but double sized. Repeat for all other parts, assemble, and now I have a 2m³ replicator. Repeat until I have one big enough to replicate a house.

    Then, the whole point of the exercise: replicate a house-sized Funyun.

  • Pudutr0n@feddit.cl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    20 days ago

    Even if you didn’t want to use it for money, you’d have to use it for money somehow just to keep up with the inflation.

    • anon6789@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      20 days ago

      In Stephenson’s “Diamond Age” novel, even the super poor had basic access to in-home replicators. They were limited to pretty basic items, but they were available.

      With everyone having access to basic goods, the rich people would go to villages of artisans that would hand make items to get unique, one of a kind things, as most crafts were now basically lost skills to most of society.

      Throughout the story, the tech is explored and eventually hacked to upend society by removing limits on what can be generated by the replicator.

    • Dizzy Devil Ducky@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      19 days ago

      I was busy thinking about that. Why not make a replicator without limits if possible? No downsides because then you’d be able to create what you want when you want. Anyone dumb enough not to think of that would be stuck using it once a day while you are able to create all you want.

    • TeamBrett@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      18 days ago

      Wouldn’t you need two replicators? One to be replicated and one to do the replicating? And if the replicator itself is a box (assumption since it was not specifies) the replicator would have to be larger than the max size.

  • CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    18 days ago

    I suspect a lot of guns, explosives, body armor and anti-armor munitions due to the immediate civil war that would break out in most countries as the wealthy elite tells the government to confiscate everyones matter replicators.

  • FaceDeer@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    20 days ago

    Day 1, I replicate a replicator kit and put it together. I also contact a realtor and let them know I’m interested in buying some land. Off grid, far from cities, doesn’t matter.

    Day 2, I replicate two replicator kits and put them together.

    Day 3, I replicate four replicator kits. I’ve now got eight of them. I’m not sure I’ll need sixteen, at least not right away, and my basement is starting to get a bit crowded. So I’ll leave it at that for the moment, but the moment I think I need more replicator capacity I can have it.

    • TeamAssimilation@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      19 days ago

      Plot twist: every replicated replicator degrades slightly in subtle ways, like making glass less smooth, or making food taste a little bit stale. After the fourth cycle, bananas taste a bit like warm mayo.

  • dual_sport_dork 🐧🗡️@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    20 days ago

    The obvious answer: Use your replicator to replicate more replicators.

    The correct answer: The Young Lady’s Illustrated Primer.

    The clever dick corollary: 1m3 is actually quite a large volume, and ain’t no rule says you can only replicate one object at a time. If whatever luxury item or commodity you want is small in volume, which it probably is, don’t forget you can replicate a whole bunch of it within a meter cube.

  • Allero@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    18 days ago

    First I’m gonna move out of my apartment since there will sure be plenty of geniuses who’s gonna produce 1 cubic meter of solid gold, and the building might not be happy about 20-ton blocks appearing out of thin air.

  • baltakatei@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    19 days ago

    It only takes one person to make 1 cubic meter of black hole to destroy the biosphere by ripping Earth into an acretion disc.

    • Zink@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      18 days ago

      I like the concept of destroying the biosphere by shredding the entire fucking planet, lol.

      Using a calculator I referenced further down in the thread, a back hole with a 0.5m radius so that the event horizon would fit within the cubic meter would have a mass of over 56 earths. We’d be proper fucked!

    • TeamAssimilation@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      19 days ago

      So you would have to replicate a percent of the mass of the sun. Seems feasible. The electricity bill would be nuts, but the world is ending anyway.

        • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          19 days ago

          Ah, i thought it was a hole in space or something like that, so the absence of anything, and even space was something, but not matter specifically.

          • wolframhydroxide@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            18 days ago

            It is worthwhile to note that the above is highly reductive. A “black hole” is the sort of “hole” in spacetime you’re thinking of. It is caused, however, by gravitational dilation of spacetime by an incredibly high energy density. If you stuff enough matter and energy into a tiny enough space, the gravitational force will be strong enough that no other force in the universe can keep it from getting closer, and closer. Even the forces which keep neutrons and protons from combining with each other will be surmounted, as the energy density increases asymptotically toward infinity. This tiny point of effectively infinite density is the black hole’s “singularity”. Surrounding this singularity is a region where anything (matter, light, space itself) that gets within that range cannot escape. This is because objects have escape velocities based on their masses. If you’re going fast enough, you’ll fly away from the earth never to return. If you’re not going that fast, eventually you’ll fall back down. The further you are from the earth, the easier it is to escape it. The “black” part of the black hole, called the “event horizon”, is the distance from the singularity at which the black hole’s escape velocity is equal to the speed of light, meaning that, closer than that, nothing can escape it. Hence why it’s “black”, because no light is escaping from it. Technically, a black hole is not perfectly black due to hawking radiation, and a black hole with a 0.5 meter schwarzchild radius would probably be small enough to visibly glow (just a bit). (probably not, see below)

            • Zink@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              18 days ago

              According to a random black hole calculator I found, a black hole with a 0.5m radius would be over 56 earth masses and the temperature would only be 0.000364 K. So, still orders of magnitude less than the cosmic microwave background.

              I know smaller black holes evaporate faster, but even that little thing (according to the calculator) would have a lifetime of a gargantuan multiple of the age of the universe. Like roughly a number followed by 45 zeros, times the age of the universe.

              The calculator: https://www.vttoth.com/CMS/physics-notes/311-hawking-radiation-calculator

              • wolframhydroxide@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                18 days ago

                Thank you! I didn’t feel like checking with the difference in masses, and based my assumption on Stephen Hawking’s statement that an earth-mass black hole (with an event horizon the size of a pea) would glow from Into The Universe: The Story of Everything. It seems he exaggerated, assuming this calculator is accurate and my understanding of its values is fair. Such an exaggeration is disappointing, if not entirely surprising.

      • WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        18 days ago

        A cubic meter of the core of a neutron star would still count as matter. While it probably wouldn’t literally destroy the Earth, I wouldn’t want to be on the same…continent…when that thing went off.

  • KokusnussRitter@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    19 days ago

    The moment you try to min max the economy will fall apart. Replicate new PC parts? Cool, but now intel/AMD/Nvidia will go bankrupt, no more development. So I guess you could min-max the economical revolution. Capitalism doesn’t appear to make sense in a world with near endless access to anything.

    Personally I’d get heaps of food and water

    I hate that by now, I have found a way for capitalist to bill you anyways.

    • TeamAssimilation@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      19 days ago

      Nah, economy would suffer and adapt, but not technology or science. Engineers still would get together and work on new designs, but not for money.

    • rasakaf679@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      18 days ago

      Wait… So getting ample food and water to common people is a downside to capitalism?

      Yea you are right, if people are fed and satisfied. They wont be needing any unnecessary stuff that feeds the capitalist.