• deranger@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    85
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    17 hours ago

    This is neat but also stupid. If a laser has enough power to fry a mosquito, it can also fry your retina.

    Yes, I’m aware he added a safety system. That’s one layer of Swiss cheese in the safety system. It’ll work flawlessly until it doesn’t. How are potential reflections handled?

    • gnufuu@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      40
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      15 hours ago

      Meanwhile, God who deliberately gave us a spare eye for this exact reason

    • Carnelian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Could run it similar to those disinfecting light bulbs (only when the room is not occupied)

      • Badabinski@kbin.earth
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        17 hours ago

        How do you ensure that the room is empty, 100% of the time? Those disinfecting light bulbs don’t have the same level of risk as this laser system.

        • Carnelian@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          31
          ·
          17 hours ago

          Perhaps a second laser defense system can be installed to ensure people stay out of the original room?

        • cecilkorik@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          17 hours ago

          Have it spray tear gas first. But wait, then the laser won’t be able to penetrate the cloud. Maybe we could add a quadcopter drone to clear a path to the mosquito for the laser to fire. But then we’ll need a system so the drone doesn’t run into a human choking on tear gas, and the drone can’t see because of the limited visibility, could we use infrared sensors I wonder? /s

          This is a stupid system. I love engineers, but they tend to uh… overengineer things like this.

          • meco03211@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            15 hours ago

            I think we’re overthinking this a bit. I have one simple question. Hear me out. Can a mosquito survive a nuclear blast? I’ll let you sit with that a minute.

            • cecilkorik@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              15 hours ago

              “Nuke it from orbit, it’s the only way to be sure” has always been my policy for spiders, mosquitoes and ticks, so I’m looking forward to World War 3 going nuclear. I’m just a bit concerned that the “from orbit” part implies I’m supposed to be up there when it happens, and while I understand the basic mechanics of how to get there, I’m not sure how I’m going to handle the logistics after that point.

    • frongt@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      15 hours ago

      I don’t think a reflection would be coherent enough to carry enough energy to cause damage.

      Personally, I’d just wear laser goggles while the system was operating.

      • Natanael@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        15 hours ago

        It doesn’t need to be coherent, just needs enough joule. The prior commenter is right, if it can fry a mosquito even a reflection will damage eyes