• ZC3rr0r@piefed.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 hours ago

    If we assume that everyone who voted Trump in the 2016 elections were either okay with this or not offended enough not to vote for him, that percentage is actually more like 25-26% (He got about 63m votes in 2016 out of a voting eligible population of 243m). Still way too high if you ask me, but at least it’s not that bleak.

    • TranscendentalEmpire@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      15 minutes ago

      He got about 63m votes in 2016 out of a voting eligible population of 243m). Still way too high if you ask me, but at least it’s not that bleak.

      One would hope that the people who abstained from voting or are ineligible would be against that type of behaviour as well, but judging on how America is doing now a days i wouldn’t put money on it.

    • GreenBeard@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      That’s an optimistic take. There are a great many reasons people didn’t vote, and it’s false on its face that they all stayed home because they didn’t condone his disgusting views on women. It’s not statistically unreasonable to assume the ratio of people who tolerate or even endorse Trump level misogyny extends equally through the non-voting population.

      If we’re going to be part of the solution, we at least need to acknowledge the scale of the problem. There’s a gut reaction to want to assume the best, if only because the alternative is depressing and isolating, but not wanting to believe it’s that bad doesn’t make it wrong.

      • ZC3rr0r@piefed.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        I agree with you, but it’s just as incorrect to point at the near 50% support he got in the 2016 elections from the voting public and draw conclusions regarding the popularity of misogyny based on that number alone too.

        • GreenBeard@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 hour ago

          Is it? There’s a lot of indicators suggesting it’s pretty close to accurate, that’s just one of many. Especially among young men, the abject hatred of women is soaring, and that attitude didn’t come from nowhere.

          • ZC3rr0r@piefed.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 hour ago

            That attitude is being pushed by social media influencers, who are in turn (proven to be) on the payroll of the folks who want to return to a feudal misogynistic society. It’s not an organic belief.

            • TranscendentalEmpire@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              12 minutes ago

              It’s not an organic belief.

              Does it matter if it’s an organic belief? By that logic I could say that believing in God isn’t an organic belief, but that doesn’t mean there isn’t a church on every corner in some towns.

            • GreenBeard@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              14 minutes ago

              Whether it’s organic or not is immaterial. We can’t turn off the propaganda fire-hose, and once people identify with it, deprogramming people from it becomes a generational effort. It’s a bit like the gender wage gap, knowing what the systemic factors are that cause it doesn’t mean it’s not real, that’s just identifying the root of the problem.