• MurrayL@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Which? argues that a customer who would have theoretically paid £1.99 for the service but was not able to do so because the actual £2.99 price was unaffordable suffered a £1 loss, even though the customer paid nothing.

    Maybe you have to be a lawyer to understand this, because to me it sounds like complete nonsense.