• Crozekiel@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    2 days ago

    They are also working to similarly kill custom ROMs. Just recently the GrapheneOS team mentioned that Google is no longer making their hardware drivers Open Source, and so compatibility with new phones means reverse engineering their own drivers - which is a big reason that custom ROMs support such narrow hardware options already and very often come with limitations and/or features that just don’t work. At best, they figure out how to make it work, but it takes time and updates can lag significantly behind.

    We have a lot of options on the software side for avoiding google (or android), but very limited options on hardware. We need open source mobile hardware support ASAP.

    • FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      They’re not so much working to kill custom roms as they are just not giving away their code anymore, going closed source for their own hardware.

      • rmrf@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Why do you think they’re making this arbitrary change?

        • FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          18 hours ago

          Because Google have been wanting to be closed source for years, which is why nearly all their new features since they released the Pixel have been PixelOS exclusive and not in AOSP.

          They don’t care about killing custom roms, that’s just a side effect of them going closed source for their Phone.

          • rmrf@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            17 hours ago

            What do you think the benefit of closing sourcing their software is if not to stifle competition?

            • FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              7 hours ago

              It means they can do way more features without giving away precious IP, and it also just reduces their workload. They don’t need to keep giving out their code for free. It makes their job harder.

              AOSP projects are not and never have been a threat to Google. They aren’t trying to stifle them - that’s just a byproduct of not giving away their code anymore. Giving it away gives literally zero benefits to them. It might only save them 0.01%, but that’s a lot money.

              • rmrf@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 hours ago

                As someone whose job runs several FOSS projects, I think you’re making up the fact that it adds meaningful workload.

                I think that, for all intents and purposes, protecting IP is equivalent to stifling competition.

                I think giving away code benefits the entire Android ecosystem, which might be the largest data mining operating Google has. I fully believe that’s of nonzero benefit.