The United Kingdom shamelessly prostrated itself at the feet of Donald Trump on Wednesday, throwing a lavish welcoming party for his state visit to Windsor that resembled less diplomacy and more fealty.

In doing so, the U.K. has revealed something deeply unflattering about itself—in the scramble to keep America close, it will debase itself and its values completely.

It will silence dissent, empty out its traditions, and rent out its monarch like a sex worker, deployed to flatter the ego of a man who has spent much of his political life suggesting he should be treated like one, a monarch, not a sex worker, that is.

As stage props go, the monarchy is unbeatable. But if this is what the “special relationship” between the U.S and the U.K. now means, it looks to many in Britain less like a partnership and more like groveling, feudal servitude.

archive article: https://archive.is/DxOAv

  • ✺roguetrick✺@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    18 hours ago

    The problem is if they decide that William the conqueror didn’t actually have allodial rights to the land, then all property rights in the UK are made up too and that’s a bridge too far.

    • Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      51 minutes ago

      In the country with the highest land ownership concentration in Europe, that would trully be an unimaginable tragedy for the local upper class.

        • Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          45 minutes ago

          There’s Liberalism the Ideology and then there’s the “Liberalism” practiced by politicians - those two are only a bit more similar than Socialism and the ideology of the National Socialist Party Of The German Worker (i.e. the NAZI Party) were similar.

          If there’s one thing I learned from inside the Finance Industry during the 2008 Crash and subsequent rescues, after having read The Economist for years, is that (Neo)Liberalism isn’t at all the flat-playing-field meritocratic free market ideology they portray themselves as.

          They’re in fact very much the opposite of that.

    • cygnus@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      18 hours ago

      We all know it’s the rightful territory of the Senatus Populusque Romanus. It’s just a matter of time.