• surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    You did the basic math, with your spherical balloon. What about giant cylinders? Then you could really pack it in.

    • dual_sport_dork 🐧🗡️@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 months ago

      Sure. You could do a cylinder of three quarters of a meter across which seems like a reasonable footprint for someone to stand in. That’d only have to be, uh, 325.5 meters tall to have the same volume.

        • ReanuKeeves@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          Your asshole “buddy” constantly throwing sharp objects at your balloon causing you to be wet all the time and laughing as you ask your mom if she can mend your massive cylinder for the 13th time this month

          • MrPistachios@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            I’ll just compress more helium and make the balloon metal so its stronger and holds more in a smaller space

            • sushibowl@feddit.nl
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              3 months ago

              I think holding more helium in a smaller space is the opposite of what you want. The lifting force is equal to the weight of the air being displaced, so you want as little stuff as possible in as big a volume as possible.

              Maybe if you went the other way round and compressed the atmosphere?