RandAlThor@lemmy.ca to World News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 month agoUN Says Trump’s ‘Unacceptable’ Boat Strikes Violate International Lawwww.mediaite.comexternal-linkmessage-square56fedilinkarrow-up1564arrow-down17
arrow-up1557arrow-down1external-linkUN Says Trump’s ‘Unacceptable’ Boat Strikes Violate International Lawwww.mediaite.comRandAlThor@lemmy.ca to World News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 month agomessage-square56fedilink
minus-squareDreamlandLividity@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·1 month agoDoesn’t it? I am pretty sure they have authority over everyone. US and other non signatories just do not have to hand them over. But if they ever visit a signatory state, they should be arrested.
minus-squareT156@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·1 month agoIn theory, they do, but the US not only doesn’t recognise the authority of the ICC, they have provisions for a military invasion of the Hague/Netherlands if a member of the US armed forces is tried in the ICC.
minus-squareNiquarl@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 month agoNo they only have jurisdiction if the crimes are either committed by a member state or in a member state.
minus-squareILikeBoobies@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 month agoThe third way is a Security Council vote but the US has veto.
Doesn’t it? I am pretty sure they have authority over everyone. US and other non signatories just do not have to hand them over. But if they ever visit a signatory state, they should be arrested.
In theory, they do, but the US not only doesn’t recognise the authority of the ICC, they have provisions for a military invasion of the Hague/Netherlands if a member of the US armed forces is tried in the ICC.
No they only have jurisdiction if the crimes are either committed by a member state or in a member state.
The third way is a Security Council vote but the US has veto.
Wasn’t aware of that thanks