sylver_dragon

The AI is a tool argument is getting tired. I haven’t seen it do anything useful at all that helps my day to day life.

I’ve also never had a use for a rib spreader. That doesn’t mean it’s not useful in the right setting. I talked through it in a different reply (feel free to use AI to find it), but LLMs and image classifiers do have use cases in particular settings. Just because some folks abuse them and use them for entirely the wrong use cases, doesn’t mean they aren’t useful in the right ones.

I might need to ask chatgpt to reply to this comment. In fact if i ever see your username around i will put it into chatgpt and ask it to generate a reply for me, because i can’t think for myself.

Go for it, it might be kinda funny. A bit of irony in it too, as it would offloading the critical thinking required to engage with an argument you disagree with.

i don’t believe i’ve ever asked calculator to answer biology question for me.

Nor should you, you would be using the wrong tool for the job. I’d also not use a calculator to drive screws, that doesn’t invalidate the point. Tools are useful when we use them the right ways. And ya, AI is a terrible tool to offload critical thinking onto. There are use cases where AI makes sense though. Things like image classification and fuzzy searches on large data sets are good use cases for various AI models. One of the problems with AI, at the moment, is that it has been sold as some sort of cure-all that will replace humans and critical thinking. And it’s absolutely not that. It’s in much the same place as cocaine in the first part of the 20th century. Hucksters are putting “AI” on the label and claiming it will solve everything. The reality is much more nuanced. It has it’s uses but they are far more limited than the hucksters are claiming.

Large language models really can be useful for fuzzy searches in large data sets. To give an example from my own work, Copilot is really good at searching Microsoft documentation for me. Could I find the answers with a regular search? Probably, it would also take me longer. Instead, I send Copilot chasing after the answer to that question and go do something else while it finds the answer. They can also help in re-writing for different audiences. I write a lot of technical reports and those need to be summarized for managerial audiences. Yes, I could do that manually, I’ve done it for years. I also hate doing it. Clippy is good enough at doing it that it can give me a first draft and I can finish it up in far less time and effort.

The biggest issue I have seen with LLMs is exactly what you point out, that people trust them too much and don’t think critically about their answers. Again with my work, we use a product that uses an LLM to summarize cybersecurity issues and provides suggestions for response and investigation. It’s a pretty well trained model and it’s suggestions are pretty good most of the time. But, it falls down spectacularly bad from time to time and the analyst needs to be able to recognize that and respond to the alerts appropriately. Some analysts are better at this than others and this is now part of our training for new analysts. We teach them to use the LLM, but to also always think about the basics and question the LLM when it doesn’t seem right.

Image classifiers are another area where I think AI has some good use cases. Consider the job of reviewing images and videos for sites like FaceBook, TikTok or YouTube. The folks who do this work are exposed to a lot of very violent and disturbing media. I used to work with a guy who did computer forensics in a law enforcement setting and he finally left that work because he could deal with having to review CSAM images any more. This seems like the perfect place to slot in an AI image classifier, to make a first pass at it. If it can correctly classify the vast majority of that sort of content, that greatly lessens the workload on the analysts who will need to deal with the borderline stuff and reports of false positives and negatives.

The new normal is people just follow what billionaire said, and you think it’s okay.

Not at all, but I also think the reactionary “fuck all AI” isn’t okay either. It’s a tool and it’s going to change things. We need to navigate that with a clear head and careful consideration.

Do you disregard people IRL who you know use a calculator for everything?

If that sounds like a ridiculous question, it’s because the use of that tool has become so ingrained in our society that we don’t question its use anymore. AI is a new tool and one which can offload a lot of mental work. Such tools have always been controversial. If Plato is to be believed (and that isn’t necessarily a given), Socrates complained that writing made men lazy and their minds weak, because they didn’t have to exercise their memories and were not taught things, just read facts.

AI is a tool, and it’s going to be worked into the fabric of our society, for good or ill. It’s also facing a lot of push-back, as have many tools, but that is unlikely to stop it. Will AI make us lazier? Absolutely. That’s kinda the point. If necessity is the mother of invention, laziness is the father. So much of human invention is all about ways to not work as hard. Sometimes, this is because we need to improve how we do something, sometimes its because we’d rather be down at the pub sipping a brew while a machine does the hard stuff. Often, it’s both.

That said, there is likely to be a lot of pain in the short term as we adjust to the new reality. And it will likely cause another shift in how work happens. Businesses used to have hundreds of people doing nothing but tabulating accounts. Rooms would be full of people just doing math. Now, we have Excel and most of that tedious work is now done by one person at the click of a button. The main problem with the rollout of AI may be one of speed. The same speed which empowers Excel is making the disruption of AI happen at a much faster speed than many of our institutions may be equipped to handle. Or not, there’s been some reporting lately that the promises of AI have been severely over-hyped (shocker, AI companies over sold the capabilities of AI, whodathunkit?). We won’t really know until we’re well past the point of disruption.

So, does it annoy me that people use (and believe) AI to answer relatively simple questions? No not really. Sure, they could take the time to look it up with google, but that is slower and harder. Or they could look it up in a book, which is even slower and harder. Or they could just memorize it and avoid that new fangled writing thing, which is making kids lazy. But, that sort of thing is a dead end. Ai is here, it’s a tool people will use. We just need to find a way to educate people about its strengths and limitations. And that is a hard problem, but maybe AI will help us solve it.

While I’m glad these guys are going to jail, this does go to show that one should not use Windows if they care about OPSEC.

Don’t worry so much about sports, as finding something you enjoy which gets you moving. The important thing is to try stuff and find something that works for you. Really, the best exercise you can do, is one you will actually do. It sounds like you have issues with team sports, so maybe try some stuff which doesn’t involve other people. Also, accept that you will likely suck as whatever you do, if you keep practicing, you might find you suck less over time.

I’m not a “sports person”. In fact, I suck as most sports I have tried. But, I discovered that I enjoy indoor sport climbing. I sucked amazingly bad at it when I first started. I mostly climb top rope and was struggling to finish a 5.9 climb. But, I kept at it and now I can finish most 5.10a climbs on my first attempt. I’m not some super climber by any means, but I have become kinda competent. I enjoy the challenge and have met some great people along the way. I also get excited when I walk into the gym and see a new set of routes. It’s like being handed a new set of puzzles to solve.

Sounds like a self-correcting problem.

Another investment area to consider is other Tax Advantaged savings accounts (e.g. IRA).

I do not really want a credit card, but I need to start using one because my credit score dropped to 550 after not making a payment for a while.

While they are a Faustian deal, you do want one. Much of our society is built around credit scores and the credit reporting companies. It sucks, but you have to deal with it. Find a credit card which doesn’t charge an annual fee, and which provides some sort of kick back you can make use of. Use this for everything, and pay it off completely every month. Use the points/miles/etc when possible.

There are two primary reasons for this. First off, it gets that credit score up. You want a high credit score as it’s often used for things like background checks. It’s annoying, but you’re not going to win the fight against it. Second, using a credit card comes with some protection for you money. If your card number gets compromised (and it will eventually, if you’re using it) credit card companies have some legal requirements to refund you for the fraud. When paying for things with debit cards and ACH transactions, those protections aren’t as strong and you may end up out some money.

The one thing I can’t emphasize enough is, pay the damned thing off every month! It’s easy for these to get out of hand. And with your current credit score, the interest rate is going to be in the range “fuck your wallet”. Letting any charges roll over is just pissing away money.

Lastly, once you have your credit accounts created freeze your credit. Don’t let them trick you into “monitoring” or other bullshit half-measure, do the freeze.

I wouldn’t expect it to replace people. It will make workers more productive. However, because it is already pretty well spread through most companies, those productivity gains will only lead to competitive advantages for companies with highly skilled workers.

Think of it like a chainsaw for lumberjacks. A lumberjack with a chainsaw is going to be far more productive than one with just a hand axe. But since every company equips their lumberjacks with chainsaws, they aren’t really at an advantage, chainsaws are now just a cost of entry for a company. Also, lumberjacks are required to know how to use a chainsaw. But they are ok.

For knowledge workers, AI is our new chainsaw. We’re going to learn to use it. And it’s going to be part of our jobs going forward. From my own experience, it has it’s uses and is pretty good at certain tasks. It can also be endlessly frustrating at tasks where it’s not well suited or the training isn’t up to snuff. We just have to learn and adjust to a world where the tool exists and is used everywhere. The genie isn’t going back in the bottle.

Not surprising. Web search from the Start Menu was always a bad idea.

Hell, I’ve had to deal with users getting their systems compromised because of this idiocy. User typed ‘ms teams’ in the start menu, clicked on the first link and ended up at an attacker’s page which mimicked the official Teams download page. User clicked “Download”, received the trojaned .msi file and ran it.

Sure, there’s some blame to go around in that case (and we finally got some default configuration changes out of it), but the fact that Microslop’s greed led to a malvertising link showing up in a user’s Start Menu is indicative of everything wrong with Windows 11.

All of the above.

Is it that ISPs are being paid by tech-bros to assign them these IPs?

Bullet Proof Hosting is a thing. Some ISPs basically advertise to criminals about their ability to evade take down orders and unwillingness to work with law enforcement. So, some infrastructure ends up on these devices. However, the IP ranges from these services often get discovered and are added to public reputation and block lists.

Along side this, cloud providers are pretty bad about policing their networks. On my own home server, I have blocked much of the Digital Ocean IP space, as it’s home to a lot of scanners, bots and other malicious traffic.

Is it that residential devices have been hacked /contain malware that does this?

This happens, a lot. The Mirai Botnet thrived on compromised home routers. People are pretty bad at updating their devices and many SOHO routers ship with some pretty bad vulnerabilities. It’s only a matter of time until someone finds an unpatched or misconfigured router and adds it to a botnet. People also get phished or install trojans all the time, adding to botnets. Darknet Diaries just had a fantastic episode on the Bayrob malware, part of which was turning infected machines into a custom botnet.

Is it trivial for companies to assign themselves residential IPs?

Some ISPs just look the other way when they get reports of malicious activity on their network. Also, attackers can force a DHCP refresh and just get a new IP when the old one seems blocked. Getting one in the first place is often as simple as signing up for service and/or compromising someone’s home PC and using it as a relay.

Paid volunteers are doing this for AI companies?

This probably happens. Afterall, we’ve already seen a company selling an AI product which was just workers in India.

Obviously this is a problem because one can rotate / cycle through residential IPs and if I aggressively block each offender in my logs permanently, then the next person assigned this IP who may be a legitimate user will be unable to access my site.

Look into Fail2Ban. This program monitors your logs and will ban IPs automatically based on criteria you set. This can include specific HTTP requests in your web logs. The ban can be permanent or can be time limited. For example, I have a container running in a cloud provider which I use to proxy requests through my ISP’s CGNAT setup. There is an NGinx reverse proxy running there and I have fail2ban watching the access log. If certain request strings are seen, the sending IP gets dumped in a permanent jail. I also have it scanning the sshd logs and banning IPs which fail to login 3 times within a short period.

It’s far from a silver bullet, but it’s something which should be running on any web facing system. Attackers will always be rattling the door knobs. There is no reason to let them keep rattling away.

I have trouble feeling sympathy for any company which didn’t greet the Broadcom buyout of VMWare with a firm plan to migrate. Expecting anything other than “abusive conduct” out of Broadcom is like expecting to jump in the ocean and not get wet.

Edge is just Chrome with a Microslop skin. They went from crushing Netscape so hard it got open sourced (mostly via monopoly shenanigans) to copying Google’s homework. And their attempts at mobile anything has been failure (Windows CE) after failure (Windows Phone) after failure (Windows for ARM).

If it weren’t for Office and companies’ undying love of Active Directory and Exchange, Microslop would be a memory and little more.

Wow. Learn something new everyday.
Thanks for sharing.

Thanks for sharing.

But, please stop using the curl command piped into a terminal pattern. Malicious actors have been abusing the fuck out of this pattern ever since the idiots at Anthropic decided that would be the official install pattern for Claude. I’ve been cleaning up infections based on people just blindly running shit like that constantly over the last couple months.

Folks, never run a random script from the internet, without being sure what you are actually about to run. If using AUR packages is considered risky. Random scripts being piped into a terminal ranks right up there with sticking your dick in a blender.

LLMs are a tool. Like all tools, we are going to go though a learning curve as we adapt to safe usage of that tool. LLMs cratering companies would be a really tame way to learn those lessons. Usually, we don’t start writing regulations around tools until we have buckets of blood to write those regulations with.

I still break out the old Sierra games (specifically the Quest for Glory series) from time to time. Those are still a lot of fun and ScummVM makes them run damn near perfectly.

Most non-indie stuff is complete and utter trash.

Ya, it’s telling that some of my favorite games these days all started as indie games. I do worry about them as they get in bed with larger producers, but I also understand the draw. E.g. I still love Valheim, but they were Embracer’d by private equity. And I’m waiting for that relationship to push them to shit all over their players. Though I understand that publisher backing lets them focus more on development and less on the marketing and distribution of the game.

So now I expect it will be just a patronising nostalgia IP reboot fest designed to extract as much cash as possible.

Ya, this is one of the big turn-offs for me. For example, I really liked Prince of Persia: Sands of Time back in the day. I’ve got exactly zero interest in the remake. Ubisoft’s logo now looking like a neat pile of dogshit, viewed from above, is pretty apt.

I think it’s pretty telling that so many of the people they talk to and a lot of the focus of the article isn’t really about older gamers, it’s about their money.

The opportunity is substantial. The 40+ segment in the US is on track to grow from $19 billion in 2022 to $43 billion by 2030, a 132% expansion at a moment when the rest of the industry is shrinking. These are players with the most disposable income, the longest gaming literacy, and the highest brand loyalty.

I’m in that “40+ segment” and I suspect part of the “problem” these companies face is that older gamers have seen the enshitification of so many of the brands we love. Our tolerance for bullshit is basically gone at this point. Micro transactions, season passes, fucking ads in games, all of that bullshit is a quick way to not get our money.

I also suspect “brand loyalty” is basically gone for the same reason. As a kid, I looked for the Electronic Arts logo. If I saw this logo on a game package, I knew I was looking at a good game. I haven’t bought an EA game in years. I don’t expect to buy an EA game any time soon and I basically ignore everything they do. Sure, if a trailer for Starflight 3 dropped, I’d sit up and take notice. I’d also expect it to be an enshitified mess wearing the skin of a beloved series to sucker me in, before pouncing on my wallet.

So ya, maybe just make good games and older gamers will inevitably buy them. I mean, Larian can pretty much say, “hi we’re making…” and I’ll have my wallet out and be pulling bills before they get any further. And maybe that’s your “brand loyalty”. Game companies who make good games and aren’t private equity firms wearing the dead skin suits of brands we used to love.

We walked to school in the snow. Uphill. Both ways!
Now get off my lawn!

Jokes aside, I think one thing we had pretty good was not having to live in constant fear of every stupid thing we did likely being put online immediately. And there not being an “online” where your mistakes would haunt you forever. I did a lot of stupid stuff in my late teens and early 20’s. And there is thankfully very little evidence of any of it. Kids these days don’t often have that luxury. We’re all young and stupid at some point. As you get older, that stupid stuff should be something you and your friends laugh about over beers, not something you fear a current employer is going to find at the top of the results when they google your name.

That said, the easy access to media and information is insanely cool. If I want to learn about the mating habits of marmosets, there is likely an in-depth Wikipedia article with way, way too much information. And it’s likely up to date and well edited. Compare that to whatever blurb might be in the encyclopedias at your local or school library, plus anything you could dig out of the periodicals and microfiche, and it’s not even in the same universe of information availability. Sure, there’s a lot more to sift through online. And it’s getting easier and easier to get lost in a sea of misinformation. But, you still stand a much better chance today of finding more, faster, than what we had back then. It’s funny to think back about instructors making a big deal about not using Wikipedia when it first came out. Now, it’s likely recommended as the first stop in researching something.

Also, I have a fucking computer in my pocket with more processing power than the entire world had available when we sent men to the moon. And I can use that computer to communicate with nearly anyone in the world instantaneously. And that computer can access that insane wealth of knowledge I just mentioned above. Again, almost instantly, from most places I am likely to be. I can be taking a shit in the woods and reading up on marmosets fucking while chatting with someone shitting on Twitter. It’s the goddamn future over here.