I love when I get that final push to leave a garbage service behind.

It is important to keep an eye on the blight, Morrowind taught us that

I’m coming over with a magnifier

That sounds kinda dystopic indeed

I haven’t seen a single Ed Sheran image where I didn’t think: “I don’t think this guy likes conflict”. I’m pretty sure the dude is just trying his best not to piss anyone off because he’s conflict averse, I doubt he needs the money.

I mean, code violation rules are there to protect people?

Alright buddy

Epstein class

People who are into psychological violence aren’t against political violence, they simply don’t have the power to commit the latter so they stick to the former.

The seed of violence is the same. The scale is only limited by your access to power.

Anyone who is victimized is a victim, the existence of greater victims do not discount the existence of lesser victims. Victimization is a binary, not graded on a scale.

Social causes are not excuses to vent your pent-up anger at life because you are unable to live skillfully.

My experience with the majority of ideologues these days is that they do this.

They give you a false question which is essentially “You’re not with the baby bunny killers are you?” And the only answer is no, and the only reason they ask you is to relieve some of all the aggression they’re carrying around by forcing you to give the answer they want by posing a false question.

It’s a socially acceptable form of psychological violence. And all it does is make healthy people distance themselves from political movements that otherwise have the right opinions, but are using them the wrong way. Because of their Egos, they’re literally losing voters.

Yes, that’s why it isn’t a question at all but a way to pressure someone into saying what you want. It’s a social dominance tactic employed by dark triad personality types.

Which are exactly the types the “righteous causes” attract, because it allows them to express their desire for social dominance by hitting people over the head with things that nobody sensible would disagree with in the first place.

“You’re not a supporter of Genocide, are you?!” No you scintillating moron, nobody in their right mind is. And if they were, they wouldn’t answer your question truthfully anyway.

My opinions are not so frivolous as to be paraded around for social clout.

Oh, how fun. Now we’ll all be even more repressed because literally every interaction will be recorded and you better not do anything cringe.

But if someone says “Take my side or you’re a murderer” they don’t care about the kids, they just want to use their moral stance as an excuse for social dominance, which is why many people end up resisting “good causes” to defend themselves against the garbage energy that’s hidden behind their “morally justified” anger.

In reality someone either has a sensible opinion or they don’t, and you’re not gonna pressure anyone into changing their mind with force anyway, so it’s just a self-serving excuse to take your neuroticism out on other people.

It’s funny because no ideology will work if the people are corrupt, and no ideology will fail if the people have character.

They’re using divide and conquer to make us fight each other over concepts, when what we all really want is people in power with character and accountability - which is the one thing they won’t give us regardless of system.

I’ll take a good man with a bad ideology over a bad man with a good ideology any week in any era.