Kizzie

I used to disagree with you, but i was new to Lemmy. Thanks for sharing

you can’t make assumptions about massive groups of people. Many people come to the west because they don’t agree with their culture. To assume everyone from one place is the same is racist

I think you are wrong here, you need to look at how likely this case is,how much they like western culture & How many people don’t agree with their culture?

But IMO usually they(anti immigrations) are sold narrative, that it is threat to them by political parties who want easy win,third party organizations who hire lobbyists for their cause & religious groups, just like communists sell their idea. IMO such diversity is good.

correct, but I hope you(or anyone else) deeply reflected on limitations of your ideology

How it was uncivil, can you explain? & person can comment in old post which he find interesting.

I see, my bad, wait no, I didn’t paid attention. my comment was not only about men, regardless of any gender, if you show these weakness, it is valid to criticize & shame you.

Edit: fuck mod who removed my comment unjustly. probably, Just because I used p Word for cowards Edit2: Noticed error in judgement

Removed by mod

I like the philosophy but I also don’t understand why anyone could pay for it. IG, It’s like chess, only top players & teachers earn money from it.

deleted by creator

1. Wild tales
2. Black mirror

Funny, for me there are more items in Must read List than Must watch.

If you are talking about banning people in debate, Then you are not being fair. Any criticism can cause annoyance to some people, even if criticism have pleasant wording

Why they made this move? does not this give them super bad Reputation? they sent message to not speak against them, is silencing people that important? I am outsider, I don’t follow USA politics so i fail to understand this.

If you are doing injustice in small acts then you will also do injustice in big acts too, Especially if you think you can get away with it. And person’s view & promise about this does not matter, Because as Schopenhauer put it,

supposing that we wanted to know, for instance, how someone will act in a position in which we intend to place him, we must not rely on his promises and assurances. For, even assuming that he spoke honestly, he speaks of a matter that he does not know. Therefore, we have to calculate his actions solely on the basis of weighing the circumstances that he will have to face and their conflict with his character.

But I think person can achieve this kind of purity, by trying to be pure everyday. The reason i believe this is because i read a ancient Indian text called Mahabharata and it talked about a asceticism, Brahman, ashramas, double celibacy(doing sex only to beget children), mahaprasthana(means great journey, when person determine to departs from home and wanders around, awaiting death). It also had stories of benevolent kings, warriors & people showing uprightness. So, l believe, some people have attainted this kind of purity already in history & it’s proof that man can control their desires and take right actions with impartiality by observing Brahmacharya

So your question, if I can be benevolent dictator without being corrupt or not?, yes, I can be but this job is not best suitable for me because of my personality And currently, my time tracking statistics & recent actions are not showing good results.