I tried self hosting it,but it felt very resource intensive on my vps. It’s a really good bookmark manager, feature rich and all. But I feel like it could have been lighter.

  • VeryFrugal@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Linkwarden has pretty minimal hardware requirements - it was tested on a VPS with 4gb of memory and it ran pretty smoothly, the most intense part is when you build the app, but once it’s running it’s relatively lightweight.

    From their website. I wouldn’t consider tested on 4gb vps having minimal hardware.

    I use Linkding and I am very happy with it. Less feature? Maybe. But it’s a bookmark sync. What do you need?

    • Moonrise2473@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      5 hours ago

      LOL if 4gb of memory is pretty minimal I am curious to know that they think to be resource intensive.

      The maximum memory I am willing to allocate to a lxc container dedicated to bookmark management (=something that I access twice a month) is 256mb

      • MotoAsh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        51 minutes ago

        4gb isn’t so bad for a build, but wtf does it need to just run smoothly?!

      • AbidanYre@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        If you just want to sync bookmarks I don’t think linkwarden is what you want. Maybe floccus? I’m going to check out linkding that someone else mentioned because using git to sync floccus is broken on mobile platforms.

    • Wistful@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      I use Linkding too, it’s very light and it’s great, I only wish it had the exclude tag filter and no tag filter. That would make it perfect.