BlueRingedOctopus@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish · 3 days agoPiracy Starter Packlemmy.dbzer0.comexternal-linkmessage-square107fedilinkarrow-up1346arrow-down114
arrow-up1332arrow-down1external-linkPiracy Starter Packlemmy.dbzer0.comBlueRingedOctopus@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish · 3 days agomessage-square107fedilink
minus-squareLime Buzz (fae/she)@beehaw.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down1·edit-22 days agoIt also says: “There have been no such studies done on non-clinical plurality yet, but interest has been growing in the field.” It is also saying that DID is one type of plurality, it is not calling it the only type. Not all of us have the clinical/medical type of plurality, DID, OSDD etc etc. If you’re genuinely interested then: https://pluralpedia.org/ explains many more types. Especially this page, gives a basic starter: https://pluralpedia.org/w/Plurality
minus-squarestarman@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·2 days agoOkay, thanks for explaining.
It also says: “There have been no such studies done on non-clinical plurality yet, but interest has been growing in the field.”
It is also saying that DID is one type of plurality, it is not calling it the only type.
Not all of us have the clinical/medical type of plurality, DID, OSDD etc etc.
If you’re genuinely interested then: https://pluralpedia.org/ explains many more types. Especially this page, gives a basic starter: https://pluralpedia.org/w/Plurality
Okay, thanks for explaining.
Sure thing!