• MadBits@europe.pub
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    4 days ago

    You would be surprised about the capabilities we had in 1970-80s for spying, with way way less technology than what we have today. At this point I think privacy is just a myth, we can literally use light to listen on people by having it bounce off of their windows and interpreting it back as sound. As a side note, rich people do use windows with a vibrating feature exactly to block this old method. There’s literally very little you can do if you are targeted by the government. (Except leaving the country, if possible)

    • naevaTheRat@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      4 days ago

      At this point I think privacy is just a myth.

      This is the cop in your head to kill. State surveillance capabilities are limited. While in theory it’s difficult to block targetted surveillance the key is to avoid being targetted by blending in.

      James Micken’s model of mosad and not mossad threats apply. If a state turns its gaze on you, you will lose. However passive dragnet methods to try and decide who to turn the eye of Sauron on can be hidden from.

      • yxc999@lemmy.mlOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        4 days ago

        Step by step. Maybe true privacy is a myth, but every step closer is a win so take them.

      • MadBits@europe.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        4 days ago

        Even crazier is that Wi-Fi sensing has been around since around 2008. The wild part is how much more they can do with it now. With AI, they can use Wi-Fi signals to track movement, map out rooms, and even detect body positions in real time. It’s not literally seeing through walls, but it’s getting pretty damn close.

        • yeehaw@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          4 days ago

          Yeah this is why I’ve long suspected this is the reason Google doesn’t let you shut off Bluetooth or wifi permanently easily anymore. Both resemble by default. And I think WiFi even stays on on android when you have it off to facilitate a feature to detect other networks or something.

            • lonefighter@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 days ago

              What do you mean by their hardware? I have Xfinity (it’s the only option for Internet in my apartment complex) and I have my own modem and router. I’ve never used Xfinity’s equipment.

          • MadBits@europe.pub
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            4 days ago

            If you’re willing to fortify your network in terms of security, I highly recommend building yourself a WiFi router or just buying a highly customizable one like MikroTik or alternatives as such. I think its easily the best defense for such cases.

            • Zedd_Prophecy@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              3 days ago

              Totally agree - if you buy the latest TP link (or whateverm model) rather than build your own, you are handing someone else your credentials. Save that old PC and repurpose it as a router

              • lonefighter@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 days ago

                Any recs for the best choice for buying a home router for someone who doesn’t have the knowledge to build or configure one? I’m smart enough to change the admin password and rename the default network/setup a new password, but that’s about it. Mine just stopped getting security updates, plus it’s a Netgear. I know no one is really trustworthy anymore, but I know some brands are more sketchy than others.

                • Zedd_Prophecy@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  The one thing I am certain of is I will not go with tp link ever again. All the add ins they charge monthly for are free with the right router. Plus I’ve never gotten an update to my WiFi 6 tplink . Wait … didn’t open WRT make their own router ? ? That is the one I’d go for because they load the open source software on it ready for you to configure. I’d imagine this is better than many other options.

              • MadBits@europe.pub
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                4 days ago

                You’ve worked on MikroTik? If so, my warmest congratulations, my absolutely favorite piece of technology in my home. 🙇

                  • MadBits@europe.pub
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    3 days ago

                    Why is that if I may ask? I mean, opnsense is indeed more versatile from what I can see.

      • Zedd_Prophecy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        Only if they first learn and train with you in known rooms. This one is much more useful for things like “which room is a moving entity in” like your dog … Rather than letting anything useful out.

      • RobotsLeftHand@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        4 days ago

        If you aim a laser on a window it can detect the vibrations of sound hitting it. Pretty much the same as placing your ear up against it, except that a laser can do it from far, far away. You can counter this by installing devices on the windows that actively vibrate them, drowning out the sound.

        What’s interesting with this technique is the sideways applications. I’ve heard you can use a chip bag to the same effect. Also, apparently you can actually figure out what someone is typing just from the audio. So with just audio you can eventually figure out their computer passwords.

        • FauxLiving@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          4 days ago

          It’s also possible to see what’s on a monitor’s display through processing the EM emissions called Van Eck phreaking.

          There’s an entire spectrum of similar attacks: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tempest_(codename)

          I’ve heard you can use a chip bag to the same effect.

          Anything light/thin enough to resonate at vocal frequencies that can reflect a laser (without altering polarization) will work.

          I do remember an experiment, using a chip bag, where university researchers were able to extract audio from a video of a chip bag. I believe they were mapping the intensity of the various specular highlights on the bag and playing the audible frequencies. It was muddied and choppy but intelligible.

          Even further, your location and time of recording can be roughly estimated based on audio recordings. It’s called Electrical Network Frequency analysis. I forget the specifics, but it had something to do with the frequency change of the power grid (the hum of which can be picked up in some audio recordings, or inadvertently captured as noise from the audio equipment). They can take the recording, determine how the frequency shifted during the recording (corresponding to grid conditions at the time of recording) and compare them to historical data from various utility monitoring stations looking for matches. wiki: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electrical_network_frequency_analysis

    • Snapz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 days ago

      Any more info on the “vibrating windows for rich people” actually for sale or being actively used on windows? Or is that theoretical?