• webghost0101@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    edit-2
    11 hours ago

    As far as i could research it is technically feasible though very impractical and low quality, way easier to sell people voice command features instead.

    As i understand it also depends on whether its a “active” speaker or not, has an amplifier behind it.

    Tvs usually use a speaker array, a bad actor company could design it in a way that one or two of those can be used to record sound in case the microphone is no longer detected.

    An ad collector wouldn’t go that far on purpose, a state intelligence operator who is covertly part of the company might.

    • otter@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Just encase your TV room in lead so it can’t get a signal out. Ezpz.

      In seriousness completely eliminating the possibility of surveillance is impossible, but that doesn’t mean you shouldn’t make it as hard as you’re willing to give up convenience for.

      • nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 hours ago

        I have never once and never will talk to my remote control. So this one’s a no brainer. Gonna do my father in laws (rented) comcast remote next.

    • Dultas@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      I had an old electronics kit as a kid that you could use the earphone as microphone. Quality was shit but it works.