But when the question is “what is so good about hoarding wealth?” and then it goes on to equal that to hoarding newspapers, the answer is “because you can do a lot more with money than with newspapers”.
If you were trying to answer the rhetorical title then fine. But a) it really didn’t come off that way and b) you’re still wrong because the observable fact is that over a certain amount money is useless and they are hoarding it.
B) you say that in a world where a billionaire wasted billions and is still one of the most powerful people that exist.
More money means more margin for error.
That’s why people like you will be the ones who will suffer the most from all of this, you straight up don’t understand how the world works. And if confronted with that you flee into a fantasy.
Nothing I had said is an opinion. Hoarding is a documented mental illness.
Yes because more money doesn’t necessarily mean more power. I assume you are talking about Musk and I am glad you brought him up because more money literally wouldn’t make him more powerful. Him being a ‘trillionaire’ didn’t change anything about what he is capable of. The only way for him to become more powerful would be to stage a coup.
No we aren’t. But you don’t have to keep replying if you don’t want to.
Look, billionaires are hoarders. Just because money is useful doesn’t make them not hoarders.
I agree.
But when the question is “what is so good about hoarding wealth?” and then it goes on to equal that to hoarding newspapers, the answer is “because you can do a lot more with money than with newspapers”.
Nobody asked that question.
It is literally the title of the post.
The title is rhetorical.
Must be, otherwise you would just say what ever it takes to save face.
And even if, the question was still asked. So your “nobody” isn’t true.
But you confirmed more then once that talking with you is a waste of time.
For the future. Just because someone states an observable fact, doesn’t meant that the person thinks it is good that it is that way.
If you were trying to answer the rhetorical title then fine. But a) it really didn’t come off that way and b) you’re still wrong because the observable fact is that over a certain amount money is useless and they are hoarding it.
A) is your opinion stated as a fact
B) you say that in a world where a billionaire wasted billions and is still one of the most powerful people that exist. More money means more margin for error.
That’s why people like you will be the ones who will suffer the most from all of this, you straight up don’t understand how the world works. And if confronted with that you flee into a fantasy.
Were are done here.
Nothing I had said is an opinion. Hoarding is a documented mental illness.
Yes because more money doesn’t necessarily mean more power. I assume you are talking about Musk and I am glad you brought him up because more money literally wouldn’t make him more powerful. Him being a ‘trillionaire’ didn’t change anything about what he is capable of. The only way for him to become more powerful would be to stage a coup.
No we aren’t. But you don’t have to keep replying if you don’t want to.