• stark@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Okay but then you are still a liar if you pretend to be a content creator so you can source free keys to flip. Why is a dev not allowed to be upset when they got duped by a liar?

    • greyscale@lemmy.grey.ooo
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Because they should be angry at their incompetent marketing people who didn’t vet the keys they sent.

      Each key they send has a cost, and this is part of it. There are technical solutions to their problems, in the form of running a beta for the streamers, and releasing beta-only keys

      This is a fabricated story because the keys they’re complaining about have no reason to exist. Its pure incompetence on the manufacturers marketing teams part.

    • greyscale@lemmy.grey.ooo
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      12 hours ago

      I do not care, even in the slightest about a marketing departments “losses” from issuing CD keys.

      Not even in the slightest. Its the cost of doing business.

      No other industry, not even the software industry, gets to do this.

      Unilever sends me some shit to review? They’re not allowed to be upset about the eventual fate of those things.

      CD keys are property, and property is tradable.

      Just because the original intent is X or Y, doesn’t mean dick for shit.

      If they didn’t like it, maybe they shouldn’t issue so many free copies.

      At some point they have to take responsibility for the keys they’re minting. They can always issue time-limited keys.

      There’s so many technical solutions to it and so much crying over the resale that I just do not buy the story.