• SocialistVibes01@lemmy.mlOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    edit-2
    5 hours ago
    1. The real explanation is that they want control. The children are a excuse.

    2. No because you can go to jail for that, like the dude with his GrapheneOS in the US. They’re probably working on that next.

      • FineCoatMummy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        14 minutes ago

        Sorry, what is the story about guy in USA with GrapheneOS?

        Someone else linked the story, but do note that he isn’t in jail. Or wasn’t last I looked a week ago. He IS facing criminal charges, which is very serious. It will most likely become a Big Important Case and could even get appealed up and up until it reaches SCOTUS.

        Current SCOTUS is corrupt. But sometimes they have managed to make good rulings anyway, such as in Carpenter v. United States, and Chatrie v. United States, about GPS location privacy.

        I say this b/c social media leads ppl to believe extreme versions of events. There were allegations in another lemmy thread that this GrapheneOS Guy was in prison. He is not. He was at his own home. But he is facing a very stressful future as a criminal defendant. He may, hopefully, be exonerated. But it remains to be seen, how it will go. Anything could happen.

        • D06M4@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 hours ago

          Duress. And yeah, as OP mentioned kids are an excuse to have an easier time defaming anyone pushing against it. “You wouldn’t steal a car” vibes. Suddenly everyone is a CSAM producer or thief unless proven otherwise, and I doubt there will ever come a time when an authoritarian figure has interest to prove someone they’re pursuing is innocent.

          But I must say you can install whatever OS you want. The reason they placed federal charges against that guy was because he allegedly deleted incriminatory evidence. They told him they were searching for child pornography, something that was completely made up as they had been tracking him because of his links with activists that were trying to protect a forest. He gave the wrong code (and could say he did so by mistake) and whoever had the misfortune of taking the phone from him wiped the phone’s data when entering it.