dwazou@lemm.ee to science@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-22 days agoIs red meat bad for health? Meta-study of 44 studies finds results depend on the sponsor. If the sponsor is impartial, studies find it's bad. Studies sponsored by the meat industry find the oppositepubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.govexternal-linkmessage-square106fedilinkarrow-up1597arrow-down114
arrow-up1583arrow-down1external-linkIs red meat bad for health? Meta-study of 44 studies finds results depend on the sponsor. If the sponsor is impartial, studies find it's bad. Studies sponsored by the meat industry find the oppositepubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.govdwazou@lemm.ee to science@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-22 days agomessage-square106fedilink
minus-squaremelsaskca@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up12arrow-down3·1 day agoI’ve had my team of “experts in the obvious” work on this for one and a half minutes and they came to the same conclusion. This is a human greed business issue, not a science one.
minus-squareDon Piano@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 day agoCool, can you show how big the effect is, based on your team’s efforts? And what the distribution of values is, based on sponsor?
minus-squaremelsaskca@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down1·19 hours agoIt’s bell curves all the way down, anything else is proprietary knowledge.
I’ve had my team of “experts in the obvious” work on this for one and a half minutes and they came to the same conclusion. This is a human greed business issue, not a science one.
Cool, can you show how big the effect is, based on your team’s efforts? And what the distribution of values is, based on sponsor?
It’s bell curves all the way down, anything else is proprietary knowledge.