dwazou@lemm.ee to science@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-22 days agoIs red meat bad for health? Meta-study of 44 studies finds results depend on the sponsor. If the sponsor is impartial, studies find it's bad. Studies sponsored by the meat industry find the oppositepubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.govexternal-linkmessage-square106fedilinkarrow-up1595arrow-down114
arrow-up1581arrow-down1external-linkIs red meat bad for health? Meta-study of 44 studies finds results depend on the sponsor. If the sponsor is impartial, studies find it's bad. Studies sponsored by the meat industry find the oppositepubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.govdwazou@lemm.ee to science@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-22 days agomessage-square106fedilink
minus-squarei_love_FFT@jlai.lulinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·1 day agoWhat if the sponsor is the blanket university funding for a professor’s research? It may have some bias, but there is no steak in the actual result. I expect to see “these results call for more research on the topic”, but that’s pretty much it.
minus-squarelmmarsano@lemmynsfw.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·23 hours ago steak stake? Accepting funding from sponsors responsible for pollution & publishing environmental toxicology studies that disfavor those sponsors was pretty common at the university medical office where I worked.
What if the sponsor is the blanket university funding for a professor’s research? It may have some bias, but there is no steak in the actual result.
I expect to see “these results call for more research on the topic”, but that’s pretty much it.
stake?
Accepting funding from sponsors responsible for pollution & publishing environmental toxicology studies that disfavor those sponsors was pretty common at the university medical office where I worked.