dwazou@lemm.ee to science@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-22 days agoIs red meat bad for health? Meta-study of 44 studies finds results depend on the sponsor. If the sponsor is impartial, studies find it's bad. Studies sponsored by the meat industry find the oppositepubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.govexternal-linkmessage-square88fedilinkarrow-up1547arrow-down112
arrow-up1535arrow-down1external-linkIs red meat bad for health? Meta-study of 44 studies finds results depend on the sponsor. If the sponsor is impartial, studies find it's bad. Studies sponsored by the meat industry find the oppositepubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.govdwazou@lemm.ee to science@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-22 days agomessage-square88fedilink
minus-squarewitty_username@feddit.nllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up101·2 days agoAnd this is yet another reason why we need independent science funding, kids
minus-squaretechnocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·8 hours agoIndependent of whom/what?
minus-squarewitty_username@feddit.nllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·4 hours ago Industry Politics Excessive earmarking Your mom
minus-squareScolding7300@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up27arrow-down4·1 day agoScience has been canceled until 2028
minus-squareScolding7300@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·edit-23 hours agoTrue, but also want to emphasize that this has worldwide implications, the NIH is a major contributor to clinical research. Probably more harmful if it produces garbage data than less data
And this is yet another reason why we need independent science funding, kids
Independent of whom/what?
Science has been canceled until 2028
Found the American.
True, but also want to emphasize that this has worldwide implications, the NIH is a major contributor to clinical research. Probably more harmful if it produces garbage data than less data