• errer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      2 days ago

      A diet of nothing but rice and beans, living in a rented room in a garage, and dumpster diving for all the remaining necessities and you can almost live in California!

      • Uriel238 [all pronouns]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        I’m on a fixed income and cannot live in California. I do thanks to parents giving me some intergenerational wealth early by paying my $2k-ish rent for me. (They’re in their eighties and still alive.)

          • titter@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 hours ago

            New York? A half month in a leaky but somehow airtight corrugated metal shed, no air conditioning and a communal bathroom that also happens to be the yard your “bungalow” is in

            Ohio? 6 months in a house that used to be someones starter home but they added more to the house, cut it in half, and now charge the same if not more rent for each half than someone paid for the original mortgage. You will be harassed for the rent because “i have to pay the mortgage” but it was paid off over a decade ago. The landlord takes multiple vacations, out of the country, every year. Conveniently around storms and bad weather, so when your roof falls in there’s nothing they can do for two weeks.

    • 418_im_a_teapot@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      You’re right, of course. But I also think it would open up a giant loophole for the wealthy. A car is essential for survival! A three million dollar car? … A 15,000sqft house?

      Of course, they could set reasonable limits. But when was the last time congress was reasonable?