You’ve managed to completely miss the point twice in a row.
I never said the United States was great because it has the largest economy. I pointed out that your claim that it ranks near last on every meaningful metric is objectively false. Those are not the same statement.
The US ranks near the top globally in income, wealth creation, technological innovation, scientific output, higher education, military power, and economic productivity. You can argue that healthcare outcomes, life expectancy, or other social metrics are more important. That’s a perfectly valid opinion. What you cannot do is pretend the other metrics stop existing because they undermine your narrative.
What’s especially amusing is that you’ve gone from claiming the US ranks near last on every meaningful metric to claiming that only the metrics you personally care about are meaningful. Those are very different arguments.
As for the socialism point, you’ve essentially admitted that you don’t know the definitions of the words you’re using and don’t particularly care to learn them.
You are arguing that because lots of people misuse a term, the misuse becomes the definition. That is not how language works. Words have meanings independent of how confidently people misuse them.
Socialism has a definition. Social democracy has a definition. Capitalism has a definition.
The fact that politicians, journalists, Reddit users, and random people on the internet routinely confuse those terms does not somehow merge them into one thing. It just means they are using the wrong words.
At this point, your position seems to be that definitions are optional whenever they become inconvenient. Unfortunately, you cannot connotate your way out of what words mean. If you’re discussing political and economic systems, the terms still have definitions whether you like them or not.
Denmark does not become socialist because people incorrectly call it socialist. The United States does not become a failure because you selectively ignore metrics where it performs well. Neither reality nor language changes simply because a lot of people on the internet are confused.
You’ve managed to completely miss the point twice in a row.
I never said the United States was great because it has the largest economy. I pointed out that your claim that it ranks near last on every meaningful metric is objectively false. Those are not the same statement.
The US ranks near the top globally in income, wealth creation, technological innovation, scientific output, higher education, military power, and economic productivity. You can argue that healthcare outcomes, life expectancy, or other social metrics are more important. That’s a perfectly valid opinion. What you cannot do is pretend the other metrics stop existing because they undermine your narrative.
What’s especially amusing is that you’ve gone from claiming the US ranks near last on every meaningful metric to claiming that only the metrics you personally care about are meaningful. Those are very different arguments.
As for the socialism point, you’ve essentially admitted that you don’t know the definitions of the words you’re using and don’t particularly care to learn them.
You are arguing that because lots of people misuse a term, the misuse becomes the definition. That is not how language works. Words have meanings independent of how confidently people misuse them.
Socialism has a definition. Social democracy has a definition. Capitalism has a definition.
The fact that politicians, journalists, Reddit users, and random people on the internet routinely confuse those terms does not somehow merge them into one thing. It just means they are using the wrong words.
At this point, your position seems to be that definitions are optional whenever they become inconvenient. Unfortunately, you cannot connotate your way out of what words mean. If you’re discussing political and economic systems, the terms still have definitions whether you like them or not.
Denmark does not become socialist because people incorrectly call it socialist. The United States does not become a failure because you selectively ignore metrics where it performs well. Neither reality nor language changes simply because a lot of people on the internet are confused.