How is this question a follow-on to what I wrote? Seems a bit of a non-sequitur.
That said, I’m generally for anything that can neuter global US hegemony without war. We’re the absolute worst influence on the world right now and have been for a century or so. I would definitely prefer a Chinese-arbitered trade hegemony to what we’re doing now, even considering the material luxury we might lose out on as a result.
Western collapse would be a disaster for China, their economic machine relies on global sales.
Would you settle for the west being neutered and dependent?
How is this question a follow-on to what I wrote? Seems a bit of a non-sequitur.
That said, I’m generally for anything that can neuter global US hegemony without war. We’re the absolute worst influence on the world right now and have been for a century or so. I would definitely prefer a Chinese-arbitered trade hegemony to what we’re doing now, even considering the material luxury we might lose out on as a result.
deleted by creator