no banana@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · edit-27 months agoWere you aware?lemmy.worldexternal-linkmessage-square14fedilinkarrow-up1431arrow-down118
arrow-up1413arrow-down1external-linkWere you aware?lemmy.worldno banana@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · edit-27 months agomessage-square14fedilink
minus-squareyesman@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up39arrow-down3·7 months agoI called a cop “Napoleon” once. He assumed I referred to the 18th century emperor. Not big readers, cops.
minus-squarescholar@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up45·7 months agoNapoleon the emperor who tried to conquer Europe and nearly succeeded is more famous than the fictional character so that makes sense
minus-squareJackGreenEarth@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up16arrow-down1·7 months agoAnecdotal evidence is so strong! There’s definitely no way you could be making a generalised statement from a single incident… /s
minus-squarelugal@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up6arrow-down4·7 months ago… because generalizations are always wrong, each and every time
minus-squareBlueFootedPetey@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up6·7 months agoSounds like a generalization, which I guess is wrong.
I called a cop “Napoleon” once. He assumed I referred to the 18th century emperor. Not big readers, cops.
Napoleon the emperor who tried to conquer Europe and nearly succeeded is more famous than the fictional character so that makes sense
Anecdotal evidence is so strong!
There’s definitely no way you could be making a generalised statement from a single incident… /s
… because generalizations are always wrong, each and every time
deleted by creator
At least one person gets the joke
Sounds like a generalization, which I guess is wrong.
thatsthejoke.zip