• Buelldozer@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    It’s odd that they want to go with the American based Fedora instead of the German based openSUSE. Only thing I can figure is that this is yet another case of European Tech infighting?

    The Register should get ahold of Robert Riemann and ask them.

    • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      It could be due to them liking Fedora better. We don’t need to kick off more distro wars over something that probably won’t affect most people.

      • Buelldozer@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        Sure but if the intent is to get away from American software companies, specifically Microsoft for Desktop OS, then why would you run Fedora when SUSE is literally right there?

          • ms.lane@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            Fedora is an American Community Project.

            There are contributors from around the world, but only Nazi America gets to choose.

  • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Basing this on Fedora doesn’t make sense. It tells me the private individual behind this proposal hasn’t done an extensive analysis on this.

  • Libb@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    what is an American distro?

    I mean does the kernel or DE have a nationality if they’re Free Software? Anyone is supposed to be able to reuse them, no? Exactly like China has already building its own OS based on GNU-Linux

    That’s why, as a mere user myself, I consider the GNU-GPL license so essential (so much more than the code being ‘Open Source’) as GPL makes it so that no one can limit what anyone else wants to do with the code. And even if the USA one day stopped being our best friends, they would have no legal claim to prevent us (or China, or anyone else) from building on top of their code or to fork it. Freedom, is great.

    • Alphane Moon@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      While I agree with the general sentiment of your post, I think a good faith argument can be made that basing such a distro on the SUSE ecosystem would make more sense.

    • ms.lane@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Red Hat?

      Founded in America, now owned by Big Blue.

      Makes everything harder for other distros by adopting an ‘our way or the highway’ approach that is a big part of the reason for the problems with GNOME too.