I don’t care if you hate it or love it, I just wanna know why you feel the way you do. Bonus points if you want to speak on specific categories you like/dislike.

  • Lemminary@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    38 minutes ago

    I like it because it’s a tool to explore sexuality in a way that my imagination could never. It’s an incredible experience to come across something so sexy that I never would’ve imagined would push my buttons in just the right way.

    It also shows me what I like and dislike, or what I could like in the right context, and makes me reflect on why I like those things.

    Other times, I’ve had a “wtf are we doing” kind of moment, wondering why or how we even got to this weird thing that we need to insert appendages into orifices. Like, isn’t it absurd on some level?

  • Horsey@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    Same as any purely pleasurable outlet: great in moderation, terrible when one can’t self regulate. I find it easy to avoid rape-y, tween, unrealistic porn in which I don’t find any sexual gratification. There’s plenty of small creators out there that produce wholesome sexual content.

  • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    2 hours ago

    there are forums that deal with porn-induced ED, mostly with medical forums though. some people are seriously addicted to it, in various stages.

  • angstylittlecatboy@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Very positively as a concept, and negatively as an industry.

    Porn shapes my sexual identity more than I’d like, but that’s just the way it is for most people in my life situation. I think I’m a more discerning consumer of most forms of media than others. I hear people talk, in an often-justifiable panic, about how music streaming is changing music listening habits and therefore music. And it’s perplexing to me that people seriously have streaming algorithms as their primary way of music discovery, that they don’t prefer something more manual. I feel the same way about porn, it’s a surprise to me that so many people just accept whatever’s on PornHub’s front page. To that end, when people say their sexual identity is “shaped by porn” I think people are generally thinking they’re into really brutal maledom, raceplay, and incest play. The former two are absolute turnoffs to me, and the latter is something I’m okay with when it’s a part of something I’d actively look for. But I’m like…would I know I’m a bisexual without porn? Would I know I wanted to be a femboy which is why I lost a lot of weight? And I know I wouldn’t know that I’m into something like gentle femdom or lactation.

    I basically only seek out amateur stuff. In a vacuum I like the idea of paying for porn, but I worry about where it’s really going; in theory OnlyFans is better but I know that isn’t completely clean either, neither are porn companies claiming to be ethical. And I dislike that OF models sometimes exacerbate the parasocial nature of it for profit. If I buy porn, I don’t want the vendor pretending it’s anything more than me buying a good, but that sells.

    I largely believe the current panic about porn addiction to be overblown, and an attempt to exploit male insecurity to get them to vote right wing. I don’t outright believe it doesn’t exist, but it’s in the same sense video games are addictive, not the way crack cocaine is addictive. It’s known that the people who report porn addiction often don’t actually watch an above average amount, they just have the most shame. I do, however, believe you should be able to masturbate without porn, and that relying on porn over an active sexual imagination is a problem.

    I could at least see the logic behind a ban on paid, live-action porn, but anti-porn groups generally include hentai in their bans, so I’m certain it’s the same logic as violent video game bans.

  • vortexal@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    8 hours ago

    I prefer hentai/rule34 but real porn can be fine too. I know that not all porn industries are bad but I do know that there are, or at least were, some really bad ones. Also, I’m mostly into tentacle hentai and live action tentacle hentai is usually absolutely terrible.

  • tgirlschierke@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    7 hours ago

    There are a lot of issues with the industry surrounding pornography (most of which would be fixed by sex workers being able to unionise), but the entertainment itself is morally neutral.

  • Hemingways_Shotgun@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Whatever someone wants to do with their body is up to them (within legal limits)

    To the people who say “she’s selling her body”, I say this:

    So are you. So am I. So is everybody. A miner or oil rigger is selling their body to be used as labour for 10 hours a day.

    An accountant is selling their body to sit at a desk and crunch numbers for ten hours a day.

    We’re all selling our bodies to corporations every day in exchange for a paycheque. If a person is comfortable using nudity for it, more power to 'em.

  • SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    16 hours ago

    I like looking at it :3

    Jokes aside, porn is a type of media, and people who think porn influences behavior should also be extremely afraid of kids who play GTA, or watch any media that depicts violence.

  • TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    16 hours ago

    Porn is just another tool. People use it in lots of different ways.

    Way too many people generalize it’s use by other people, mostly because of the shame around sex and sexual identity.

    But that’s also true of any media or medium. Tons of people still shame TV or video games as evil/bad inherently. And judge others consumption but feel victimized when they are judged for their consumption preferences.

  • Wahots@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    1 day ago

    As long as it’s legal, live and let live, imo. Life is too short.

    Though I also encourage people to not rely on it as their only outlet for being horny. It creates unrealistic expectations around nudity and sex, which is irritating in certain scenarios.

    It’s extremely apparent when someone thinks nude beaches are for sex because they’ve watched a shitload of porn and start acting out. Everyone else is talking with friends, reading books, or getting some sun.

    If you want to do voyeurism, go to your local kink events, there’s plenty of them through FetLife.

    • Katana314@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      18 hours ago

      I know for myself, I have a bit of a mental barrier of separation between what I find kinky in fictional media, and what I would ever expect of real people. I fear for people that break that barrier, failing to understand the ways fiction goes outside of reality.

      Of course, there’s rare cases where people somehow match porn - it’s probably best to let those be a surprise, not something you seek.

  • Assassassin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    51
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    I’m a fan of the product, but hate a lot of aspects of how it’s made.

    1. Actors have so much stigmatism to deal with just to work.

    2. People are abused far too frequently and lack a lot of protections that they should have.

    3. i fucking loathe only fans. It’s added a brand new breed of spammers dropping shitty strip teases full of links onto any amateur porn site, normally completely unrelated to whatever place they’re posting. If I’m looking at the tinytits sub, your giant tiddy goth gf post is not going to make me send you $5.

      • Assassassin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        Extremely negatively. We already have an overabundance of free porn catering to effectively any fetish you could want, and even fringe stuff has sites, OF models, and r34 artists willing to commission it.

        We do not need to use absurd amounts of water and electricity to produce something that’s already very available. If you have a fetish so niche that you need AI to generate it, you can either pay someone to do it/draw it, or go without.

        • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          Eh I disagree with the power usage point, specifically. Don’t listen to Altman lie through his teeth; generation and training should be dirt cheap.

          See the recent Z Image, which was trained on a shoestring budget and costs basically nothing to run: https://arxiv.org/html/2511.22699v2

          The task energy per image is less than what it took for me to type out this comment.


          As for if we “need” it, yeah, that’s a good point and what I was curious about.

          But then again… I don’t get why people use a lot of porn services. As an example, I just don’t see the appeal of OF, yet it’s a colossal enterprise.

          • Ungraded@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            15 hours ago

            $628.000 is not exactly shoestring budget.

            Maybe not as much as others are using but I would say by far the most university research groups couldn’t afford that.

            • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              edit-2
              15 hours ago

              Not in terms of energy use, ~110 Megawatt hours. Even if you multiply that for production costs, test training runs and such, its less energy than an airline flight, or the yearly power consumption of a few homes. And it only needed to be done once.

              It’s not a trivial financial cost though, no.

        • Artisian@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 day ago

          As already indicated; energy and water use is not so big. It costs substantially more data center time to store and stream high def film then to generate even hundreds of images. Generation itself is very resource cheap compared to human actors and a film crew.

      • ImgurRefugee114@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Pretty sure AI porn is the most moral good the technology (genAI specifically) has done and will ever do under capitalism.