• fartographer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    6 days ago

    When I drop something on the floor and then blow on it in short soft bursts, it’s suddenly clean enough to consume.

  • zout@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    7 days ago

    There are people who are always lucky, and those who are unlucky. The lucky ones tend to win more coin flips, have less accidents, and if they fail it will be upwards.

    • Colonel_Panic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      “Luck is where preparation meets opportunity.”

      That has really stuck with me. It isn’t so much that some people "always get lucky’ it’s more true to say they are more prepared to catch the opportunities that happen.

      • Bubbaonthebeach@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        7 days ago

        I’ve known plenty of very prepared people over the last 60 years to know that opportunity doesn’t show up for everyone nor can they make it happen. There is always some luck, good or bad, that happens in people’s lives.

    • Tujio@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      I’d use myself as a counter example. I’m pretty lucky in life. I’ve got a decent job, I can pay the bills, I’ve got a wonderful wife and supportive, friendly family. I’m doing better than the vast majority of humanity.

      Games of chance? Unbelievably bad. Statistical anomaly. It once took me 25+ tries to win on a 30% odds lottery ticket.

      • zout@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        7 days ago

        I’m pretty much the same, but for the games of chance; As long as the prize isn’t monetary, I tend to do really good. Coin flip because two people asked the day off and only one can take it? Sorry for the other guy.

        Another thing that I’m really good at is pushing a button. If for some reason something doesn’t work after pushing a button (either computers or machinery), just complain to me it isn’t working. I’ll ask if I can try, and somehow it always works. Actually a very usefull skill when I worked as an operator in various chemical plants. Coworkers had mixed feelings about it tough.

    • justanotheruser4@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 days ago

      Maybe the win percentage of lucky and unlucky people are the same, but lucky people win when it matters most, while unlucky people when there is nothing important at stake

    • Psythik@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      7 days ago

      That explains the miracles. He took on a humanoid form so he wouldn’t frighten their simple minds, and the “miracles” he performed were just him using contemporary alien tech to heal illnesses and turn water into wine. Dude was just trying to help advance humanity, and they killed him anyway.

      Imagine the insane technology we’d have today if the Romans just let him do his thing.

      • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        “water into wine” was a story about sneaking libation in where it was was forbidden. It was more “quarter behind the ear” than actual magic.

        • RattlerSix@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 days ago

          There was a guy named Hero of Alexandria who was alive at the time of Jesus. He was a brilliant inventor, like the DaVinci of his day. He wrote 4 books. The first 3 are about his own inventions and the 4th seems similar but is thought to be a book explaining how other common things worked. In that 4th book he details how a trick “water into wine” jug works.

          This is like Jesus trying to prove who he is by doing a card trick. “Look, I know all the other card tricks are just tricks, but THIS ONE is really magic.”

  • Uncle Roach@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 days ago

    We have higher dimensional organs and we can’t see them because, well, they’re from a higher dimension. The soul is one of these organs

    • Lemminary@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      can’t see them

      Wouldn’t we still be able to see them, though? Even if they’re in a higher dimension, they’ll still show up in our known dimensions, even if partially. Otherwise, they wouldn’t be interacting with our body at all.

    • scripty@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      Sounds interesting. What other organs do you think fall under this category?

      • StupidBrotherInLaw@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        7 days ago

        I’ve been told my organ has helped hundreds of men and women reach a higher state of being.

        My brain, when I was a professor.

        /boomerhuumer

  • TAG@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    I am convinced that I will come down with cold/flu if I breath too much cold air. When I walk in the cold, I always wrap a scarf around my mouth and nose. If I don’t, the cold air will give me a sore throat. That sore throat will act as a Petri dish for illness to develop and spread into my lungs or nose.

    I know plenty of medical professionals and all of them tell me that that is not how it works, but I have a datum of proof. In my first year of university, I had a nasty, persistent respiratory infection during the late fall/early winter. To keep my throat warm while it was recovering, I started wearing a scarf and my illness went away quickly. After that, I started wrapping up whenever I was walking to class in the cold and never got sick again.

    I am now used to wrapping my face in the cold and feel wrong without it. When I don’t, it seems like I am more likely to come home with a scratchy throat. I can definitely say that many of my flus start in the throat (though it could just be that the first flu symptom I tend to notice is the sore throat).

  • TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    being a shitty person is way more beneficial than being a good person.

    and i mean by shitty/good basically morality. being a amoral selfish person is almost always better for the individual.

    however, i think such people are always going to be unhappy due to the instability of their life.

    • Colonel_Panic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      7 days ago

      I really liked that one Study? Experiment? Whatever it was that had people program different strategies to play a game for them. It was a “game theory”/“prisoner’s dilemma” type game. The kind where if you play nice you each win a little, but if you play mean you might both lose or you might win a lot.

      Anyway, they made a whole bunch of AI type strategies that would compete and over time, the cutthroat or evil strategies would win in the short term, but over long term the cooperative play nice strategies always prevailed.

      It may or may not be true, but I choose to believe that the best, most efficient, most beneficial strategy is always the one that favors cooperation, mutual aid, and forgiveness over cutthroat, deception, grudges.

      Put another way, fighting and competition wastes more resources than it ever gains, cooperation and sharing is a better strategy.

      • zout@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        7 days ago

        I agree with you, but I’m afraid some people don’t care if everybody loses, including themselves, as long as no one has it better than them.

      • TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        people’s lifespans are short. hence short term matters more than long term.

        also fighting and competition bring meaning to life. long term cooperation, not so much.

    • davad@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      7 days ago

      I don’t think that’s true by itself. I think you also have to be good at pretending to be a “good” person (or at least only being “bad” to the out-group). We are social creatures. If someone is showing obvious antisocial behavior, they get shunned from the group.

      • TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        IME it’s exactly the opposite. the most anti social people are the most socially rewarded. the sociopaths, psychopaths, and narcissists are far more socially popular than any other type.

        the most altruistic people are shunned because tehir altruism makes other people feel bad.

        but i live in the USA.

    • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      the evil people always live to ripe old age to 100 while others is barely 70-90 on average. kissinger, murdoch all are well past 90.

    • agent_nycto@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      It can seem like that, but the prisoner’s dilemma breaks down when you realize that in the real world, interactions like that where people can get screwed over or not rarely happen once, and screwing someone over has consequences outside of that interaction.

      Like, if a shop screws over customers, sure, on paper it seems to make sense because they are making money in each interaction, but people will stop going to that shop, and tell other people to never go there, eventually closing the shop.

  • flamiera@kbin.melroy.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    6 days ago

    Eating boogers strengthens your immune system.

    I mean, it’s plausible, because the idea of building your immune system is exposure to some of those things. Not trying to invalidate the other methods because those should be a better alternative. Some studies suggested boogers can help.

  • mech@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    7 days ago

    People were happier in the stone age than they are in first world countries today.

    Our brains did not evolve for the lifestyle we’re living today.
    I sure as fuck would be happier out hunting, gathering and making handcrafted tools during the day, then telling stories by the campfire wrapped in a fur at night.
    Even if there’s no toilet paper, I could get mauled by a bear every day, and if not, the tribe will leave me behind on the next migration when I’m too old and weak to keep up.

    I’d rather live 30-60 years like that than edit another Excel sheet. Sadly, our “civilization” made that way of life completely impossible.

    • EponymousBosh@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      the tribe will leave me behind on the next migration when I’m too old and weak to keep up.

      FWIW, this part is almost certainly not true.

      https://www.sciencenewstoday.org/these-4000-year-old-bones-reveal-a-shocking-secret-about-humanitys-earliest-caregivers

      https://www.npr.org/sections/goatsandsoda/2020/06/17/878896381/ancient-bones-offer-clues-to-how-long-ago-humans-cared-for-the-vulnerable

      https://news.usask.ca/articles/research/2017/ancient-spinal-injury-a-story-of-survival.php

      These are just a handful of these types of stories, there’s loads more if you want to search for them. But the upshot is: your family or tribe would have taken care of you to the best of their ability, for as long as they could, and you would have been given a decent burial when you died.

    • nevemsenki@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      7 days ago

      To be fair, stone age life has some drawbacks too. Few would want to potentially die to a failing tooth, die to any kind of disease or starve to death if winter is harsher than expected.

      • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        infection, and predation, and probably starvation, or poisoning from eating a poisonous plant or animal, or dying from venom. not so much happyness.

      • mech@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        I agree that few would choose that life.
        I still believe those who were forced to live that life led happier (if shorter) lives.

      • WoodScientist@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 days ago

        I think of something like a compound bone fracture. Today, with modern medicine, that’s a routine and easily treatable injury. But at any point up til just a few centuries ago, a compound fracture was a death sentence. A clean single break could be reset, but multiple pieces require surgical intervention and alignment. And that just couldn’t be done safely. The physicians then just didn’t know how to prevent infections enough to make that surgery survivable. Plus they didn’t have x-rays to guide them, etc.

        One day and you take a fall. Nothing extraordinary. You don’t fall off a giant cliff hundreds of feet to your death. You fall off a small 4’ high ledge. You land wrong, and you break your leg in a compound fracture. And that’s it. You’re now a dead man crawling. There’s nothing anyone on Earth can do to help you.

    • michaelmrose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 days ago

      The level of violence was fantastically high like worse than a war torn country all the time for everyone. Along with all the starvation and disease which nobody could do anything about because even washing hands or what a disease is is completely unknown.

      Starving by age 5, getting your head bashed in by 20 or a really ugly disease death before 30. Also you spent all your time struggling to have enough to eat continually.

    • scripty@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      Yeah, I kinda agree with this. The usual argument against this is usually something along the lines of “but you’d probably die of dysentery by the age of 40”. But I think I’d be okay with that. Better to have lived a short life outside an office than to live to be a 100 spending 45 years in an office.

      • iii@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        Better to have lived a short life outside an office than to live to be a 100 spending 45 years in an office.

        That’s a choice you can still make today. What’s keeping you from doing so?

        • scripty@lemmy.caOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 days ago

          Because I’ve made choices like having a spouse who would rather live a long life, and kids that I didn’t have at the age of 18. I’d like to be there for them. I get what you’re saying though.

    • LaLuzDelSol@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      I think we all feel that way from time to time, but the way I know it isn’t true is that the closer you actually are to losing civilization and the comforts it provides the less you want it. Freezing your ass off in the rain? Nobody craves the stone age then.

  • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    7 days ago

    That if you can’t find something or something doesn’t work, it will continue to be missing/not work until you complain about it to someone, at which point it will start working/show up and you look silly.

    Kyle’s Law is harsh, but fair (and rather annoying)

  • early_riser@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    The best way to find something you’ve lost is to buy another one, then you’ll find the original.

    Antivaxxers are chaos cultists who want to share Grandfather Nurgle’s gifts with humanity.

    Sometimes my dead dogs visit me in my dreams. I know they’re supposed to be dead in the dream and I give them lots of pets and belly rubs. Then I wake up feeling great. Yes I’m 99% sure it’s a product of my unconscious mind but sometimes…

    All animals have limited intelligence. Humans are animals, therefore humans have limited intelligence. Take a chimp or a dolphin and try to teach them calculus. Now imagine what realities lie beyond human understanding. There’s a whole epistemological realm of the unknowable out there.

    • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      thats probably why we wont break out of post-fusion tech, if we even get there. let alone generating antimatter which is probably the next step after fusion, or FTL tech. in many franchises it always involve aliens help who surpassed that.

  • AceFuzzLord@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    The moment you become rich, you will absolutely be contacted by the shadowy ring of other rich people so they can force you in one way or another not to out their pedo ring. Even going as far as assassinating you if blackmail doesn’t work.

    People using genAI without a care came about as a result of the genAI companies making millions of fake accounts across all of mainstream social media and performing the greatest astroturfing ever, in their favor.

    The majority of actual human interaction in the future will be secretly held in spaces run under things like Usenet, I2P, Gopher, etcetera. A way to detect bots/genAI will become a game of whack-a-mole and it’ll help keep these treasures safer than 99% of the internet.

    Anubis ( or whatever it’s called ) becomes a government funded project, with the goal being that government websites are spared from rampant AI bots crashing their sites. The downside is that it would most likely become closed source in order to ensure genAI companies cannot come in and use the source code to break through it.

    Wikipedia joins one of the alternate internet things ( maybe I2P ) and poisons its own services, leaving ample notice of what they’re gonna do, but not where they’re going, to keep safe from the bots. It’ll become a race to find where and when Wikipedia becomes available again. This is more of a firm pipedream, but I hope they do it for their own good.

    Visiting the clear web essentially becomes a crime amongst all tech savy people and you’ll absolutely be casted out of the safe spaces if you venture out of a genAI free Haven.

    Or most likely out of everything, in less than a decade, the clock strikes midnight and once the dust settles, everyone left alive will be afraid when the wind blows.