• explodicle@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    But supporting their central point, Marx did propose a solution that would make have made microplastics evitable.

    • Uriel238 [all pronouns]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      Only on the presumption that we didn’t detect it and aim for solutions sooner (e.g. invent circular recycling of plastics, replace major causes of microplastics with degradeable alternatives, say, vulcanized rubber with rubber and mushrooms).

      Also the society’s response in this late hour would probably be more effective than a disinformation campaign and a shrug.

      • optissima@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        I think it’s safe to assume that if we had stronger regulations, some of which were first implemented 1980, we’d be looking at significantly less than now.

        • Uriel238 [all pronouns]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 day ago

          Agreed, but 1980 was the beginning of the Reagan-Bush era and massive environmental deregulation, which only got worse through Clinton and George W. Bush.

          The great conservative movement killed conservation.

          • optissima@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            23 hours ago

            Your phrasing seems to indicate that you’re refuting my point when it strengthens it? Yeah if we had followed the Republican bare minimum instead of letting the bottom drop out it’d already be significantly less of an issue.