You can block apps or give them a time limit

deleted by creator

deleted by creator

Blue war crimes good, red war crimes bad

This isn’t giving one group more than the other, it’s not like you can murder men now.

Any criticism of this law should be around the ineffectiveness of harsh punishments as a deterrent, not that it’s sexist

This isn’t a special law to make it easier to prosecute. It adds femicide to the list of elements that can elevate the sentencing.

Edit: I don’t think this is necessarily a bad thing, I am broadly skeptical that harsher sentences will do anything to reduce crime. This needs to be paired with strong cultural changes if it’s to do anything.

Yeah, the real number from that study was ~28% self admitted, which is still extremely bad

Honestly, I wouldn’t wait for valve, they do things on their own time.

Bazzite is basically the exact same thing. There’s a few technical differences but they don’t really matter for a normal user

Mark Epstein, who sent the email, came out and said it wasn’t clinton though.

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/open-source

In addition to what everyone’s suggested, you can also add custom CSS for their jellyfin account to hide stuff they don’t need access to.

There’s a difference between interviewing someone and helping thrm share their message

Yes, source available is distinct from open source. Source available just means you can see the code. Open source allows you to modify and redistribute the code.

Yeah, you can. SteamOS is basically just a customized arch Linux. It’s what runs on the steam deck, which you can install non-steam games on. They integrate really well into the console experience as well.

NSA, but yeah

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/33_Thomas_Street

I mean, at least they nailed the dystopian aesthetic

Consent require all parties to know the consequences to be fully informed

Yes, that’s what I said earlier:

“Consent doesn’t mean only doing things you’re into, it means you’re agreeing to it free from any pressure or influence on your decision and you know everything you need to know to make your decision.”

When I say I don’t care what people do as long as there’s consent, that’s a requirement built into that statement. The vast vast majority of choking isn’t consentual, that’s the issue we need to address.

There is no after care for brain damage. This is where the kink community needs to come together to put their foot down.

This isn’t a kink issue, it’s a mainstream issue.the kink community takes consent and safety incredibly seriously. In this case that’s stuff like roleplay choking or breathplay.

Okay this comment makes me think you don’t understand consent.

If it was SO consensual why are guys not getting choked equally?

My partner has fetishes I’m not into, but I engage in them because I want to give him the pleasure he gets from them. Is that not consentual because I’m not into the fetish?

Consent doesn’t mean only doing things you’re into, it means you’re agreeing to it free from any pressure or influence on your decision and you know everything you need to know to make your decision.

I won’t be choked and I wouldn’t choke someone because it is dangerous and I’m uncomfortable with it regardless of if the other person wants it. But as long as people consent and know the risks I don’t care what others do.

The answer is it isn’t. It is about dominance and power not a consensual act.

Dominance and power can absolutely be consentually engaged in. The bdsm community takes consent incredibly seriously.

There are larger cultural elements behind what people are into that are worth examining. Cultural influence doesn’t necessarily mean it isn’t consentual though.

Sorry if I got off topic and triggered your misogyny.

Glad you can recognize you changed the topic.

Discussing issues of consent is valuable and important. Doing so because two adult’s consentual acts make you uncomfortable is unhelpful and actively harmful because you’re conflating consentual and non-consentual actions.