I don’t get it
I don’t get it


That’s a totally fair criticism of it but I definitely didn’t read that intention from the poster. Your screenshot example is very funny though. It’s obvious imo this was very much just an “oh shit we need AI cause everyone is doing AI” decision by higher ups that didn’t really care about anything except being able to say they have AI now


That’s not even the point stated in the original post though. Calling it simply “racist content” or “extremist references” (???) is extremely misleading. There’s significant additional context being left out. It didn’t give it unprompted and it didn’t give it for racist reasons either. The bar to show and demonstrate how horrible AI is is already underground, there’s no need to try to do it in a misleading clickbait way


Not sure if you’re just goofin but every source I found said chiefs as plural https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/chief


Cross posting my comment from this user’s other post:

I really don’t want to make an account so I made use of vxtwitter to get the screenshot from the embed. The bottom of the text window has the mostly cropped text
These examples are meant to reflect the types of conversations that might occur in a
It reads like the AI was prompted to give examples of racist behavior and then it gave examples of racist behavior, likely ending with the context that it’s racist behavior at the end of that sentence. I don’t like AI but I don’t think this is it chiefs. But maybe op can tell us themselves cause they probably wrote the Twitter post



I really don’t want to make an account so I made use of vxtwitter to get the screenshot from the embed. The bottom of the text window has the mostly cropped text
These examples are meant to reflect the types of conversations that might occur in a
It reads like the AI was prompted to give examples of racist behavior and then it gave examples of racist behavior, likely ending with the context that it’s racist behavior at the end of that sentence. I don’t like AI but I don’t think this is it chiefs
Ah thanks, I never tried to embed an image before in a comment. I updated mine since I also swapped out the image earlier to show the full reference/context
Of course he isn’t, him being naked and blue and destroying the other person with a finger point is in reference to Dr Manhattan.

I’m not entirely sure but it might be a Watchmen reference.
Edit: now I’m sure. Referenced panels linked in another comment
I know it’s not the point of the joke but
Father’s brother’s nephew, assuming the father doesn’t have any other siblings, would mean a sibling of the person in question. Then cousin would mean a child of the father’s brother (uncle).
If the father has additional siblings, the end result is still just a cousin or sibling of the original person in question’s roommate. Not very many steps removed compared to how it originally sounds :p
Edit: this is assuming the uncle isn’t married and has in-laws with a nephew on that side, which I didn’t think about originally. So it could be not circling back on itself but hey I already wrote the comment so
Consider that people before transition are not necessarily any different from any other people. You can have very racist, transphobic, alt-right people secretly harboring trans feelings themselves. Sometimes people will turn to those spaces as a coping mechanism and then they become entrenched and invested in the communities. Just because they eventually finally accept their transness doesn’t mean they’re willing to let go of it entirely or the personality archetype they’ve developed as a part of it. If they leave it entirely just because they transitioned , they may not have another community they feel enough a part of to fall back on. Everyone needs and wants some sort of feeling of community even when it isn’t good for them. It can be very hard to break out of toxic spaces when it’s the only space you know and it’s practically defined you as a person, sometimes for most people’s adult lives
It looks to me like it’s making fun of the really bad brain worms that permeate the trans 4chan community. There’s a very specific type of brain wormed in-group jargon being made fun of here. The orange stick figure is saying they’ll never be orange but we can clearly see they’re just… orange. The brain worms are so bad that they believe even while being orange, they aren’t actually. The green stick figure, not being involved with the community or perspective of it, is a representation of the few people trying to break the brain worms within the community. The author knows exactly where the terms being parodied come from and wrote it for that audience
It’s the kind of thing that’s utterly incomprehensible to anyone who isn’t familiar with 4tran or tttt


I heard the VI works fine in the US but I guess not the VII? The Xperia subreddit seems to constantly recommend against it


If only there were still US models, I would absolutely buy the VII. I love my IV but dropped it a few too many times and have some cracks and occasional weird screen issues because of it. The price point is pretty bonkers but I make enough to afford it and haven’t regretted what I spent on it at all.


I’m one of those people that basically never uses consumables in games because I never know when a good time to use them is. I really like the way expedition 33 does it instead because there’s no reward to hoarding them so I actually do use them. You only have a couple and they refresh every time you rest, plus you can also increase your max of each throughout the game.
I know this is political memes so def something not fun but until told otherwise I’m choosing to believe some kind of Easter Bunny bimbofication art went super viral and now people just wanna see more of it cause they realized they like it